* </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code long[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

           * instead of having to catch more broadly (potentially even including, say, a
           * StackOverflowError).
           */
          Class.forName("java.lang.invoke.VarHandle");
        } catch (ClassNotFoundException beforeJava9) {
          return null;
        }
        return new VarHandleAtomicHelper();
      }
    };

                .toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
        if ("always".equals(styleColor) || "yes".equals(styleColor) || "force".equals(styleColor)) {
            context.coloredOutput = true;
        } else if ("never".equals(styleColor) || "no".equals(styleColor) || "none".equals(styleColor)) {
            context.coloredOutput = false;

        options.color().ifPresent(color -> {
            String c = color.toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
            if (!Arrays.asList("always", "yes", "force", "never", "no", "none", "auto", "tty", "if-tty")
                    .contains(c)) {
                context.parsingFailed = true;
                context.parserRequest
                        .logger()

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableLongArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

	case madmin.DeleteBucketBktOp, madmin.ForceDeleteBucketBktOp:
		err = globalSiteReplicationSys.PeerBucketDeleteHandler(ctx, bucket, DeleteBucketOptions{
			Force:      operation == madmin.ForceDeleteBucketBktOp,
			SRDeleteOp: getSRBucketDeleteOp(true),
		})
	case madmin.PurgeDeletedBucketOp:
		globalSiteReplicationSys.purgeDeletedBucket(ctx, objectAPI, bucket)
	}

                
            case FILE_REMOVED:
                entry.removeChild(childName);
                break;
                
            case FILE_MODIFIED:
                // Remove from cache to force refresh
                entry.removeChild(childName);
                break;
                
            case DIRECTORY_RENAMED:
                // Full invalidation needed
                entry.invalidate();

Em muitos casos ela só copia um fragmento do código, mas isso não é suficiente para **reproduzir o problema**.

* Documentar tudo com OpenAPI, que poderá ser usado por:
    * Sistemas de documentação interativos.
    * Sistemas de clientes de geração de código automáticos, para muitas linguagens.
* Fornecer diretamente 2 interfaces _web_ de documentação interativa.

---

Nós apenas arranhamos a superfície, mas você já tem idéia de como tudo funciona.

Experimente mudar a seguinte linha:

```Python