data = "<img src=\"http://example/foo.jpg\" width=\"x\" height=\"x\">";
        assertNull(transformer.getThumbnailUrl(responseData, getDocument(data)));

        data = "<img src=\"http://example/foo.jpg\" width=\"10\" height=\"100\">";
        assertNull(transformer.getThumbnailUrl(responseData, getDocument(data)));

        data = "<img src=\"http://example/foo.jpg\" width=\"100\" height=\"10\">";

					</p>
				</div>
				<div class="modal-footer justify-content-between">
					<button type="button" class="btn btn-outline-light"
						data-dismiss="modal">
						<la:message key="labels.crud_button_cancel" />
					</button>
					<button type="submit" class="btn btn-outline-light"
						name="delete"
						value="<la:message key="labels.crud_button_delete" />">
						<em class="fa fa-trash">

 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

                        </h1>
                    </div>
                    <div class="col-sm-6">
                        <ol class="breadcrumb float-sm-right">
                            <li class="breadcrumb-item active"><la:link href="/admin/badword">
                                <la:message key="labels.bad_word_link_list"/>
                            </la:link></li>

                                <la:form action="/admin/boostdoc/">
                                    <div class="form-group row">
                                        <label for="urlExpr" class="col-sm-2 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                                key="labels.boost_document_rule_url_expr"/></label>
                                        <div class="col-sm-10">

      return new Ordering<Entry<String, Integer>>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> left, Entry<String, Integer> right) {
          return left.getKey().compareTo(right.getKey());
        }
      }.sortedCopy(insertionOrder);
    }

    @Override
    public List<Entry<String, Integer>> create(Object... elements) {

                                <la:form action="/admin/webconfig/">
                                    <div class="form-group row">
                                        <label for="name" class="col-sm-2 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                                key="labels.name"/></label>
                                        <div class="col-sm-10">

### Disable Response Model { #disable-response-model }

Continuing from the example above, you might not want to have the default data validation, documentation, filtering, etc. that is performed by FastAPI.

But you might want to still keep the return type annotation in the function to get the support from tools like editors and type checkers (e.g. mypy).

        problem = new DefaultProblem(null, null, null, Integer.MAX_VALUE, -1, null);
        assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, problem.getLineNumber());

        // this case is not specified, might also return -1
        problem = new DefaultProblem(null, null, null, Integer.MIN_VALUE, -1, null);
        assertEquals(Integer.MIN_VALUE, problem.getLineNumber());
    }

    @Test
    void testGetColumnNumber() {

                                <la:form action="/admin/keymatch/">
                                    <div class="form-group row">
                                        <label for="term" class="col-sm-2 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                                key="labels.key_match_term"/></label>
                                        <div class="col-sm-10">