assertThat(request.tag(String::class.java)).isSameAs(stringTag)
    assertThat(request.tag(Long::class.javaObjectType)).isSameAs(longTag)
  }

  /** Confirm that we don't accidentally share the backing map between objects. */
  @Test
  fun tagsAreImmutable() {
    val builder =
      Request
        .Builder()
        .url("https://square.com")
    val requestA = builder.tag(String::class.java, "a").build()

labels.wizard_button_register_next=Create
labels.wizard_start_crawling_title=Start Crawling
labels.wizard_start_crawler_title=Crawler
labels.wizard_start_crawling_desc=You can start crawling now by clicking "Start Crawling" button.
labels.wizard_button_start_crawling=Start Crawling
labels.wizard_button_finish=Skip
labels.search_list_configuration=Search
labels.search_list_button_delete=Delete

import java.util.TreeSet;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An immutable builder for {@link Multimap} instances, letting you independently select the desired
 * behaviors (for example, ordering) of the backing map and value-collections. Example:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * ListMultimap<UserId, ErrorResponse> errorsByUser =
 *     MultimapBuilder.linkedHashKeys().arrayListValues().build();

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       *

   */
  public static <K, V> ImmutableMultimap<K, V> of(
      K k1, V v1, K k2, V v2, K k3, V v3, K k4, V v4, K k5, V v5) {
    return ImmutableListMultimap.of(k1, v1, k2, v2, k3, v3, k4, v4, k5, v5);
  }

  // looking for of() with > 5 entries? Use the builder instead.

  /**
   * Returns a new builder. The generated builder is equivalent to the builder created by the {@link
   * Builder} constructor.
   */

     *
     * For tests this must be big enough to realize real compression on test messages like
     * 'aaaaaaaaaa...'. Our tests check if compression was applied just by looking at the size if
     * the inbound buffer.
     */
    const val DEFAULT_MINIMUM_DEFLATE_SIZE = 1024L
  }

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       */

   */
  public static <K, V> ImmutableMultimap<K, V> of(
      K k1, V v1, K k2, V v2, K k3, V v3, K k4, V v4, K k5, V v5) {
    return ImmutableListMultimap.of(k1, v1, k2, v2, k3, v3, k4, v4, k5, v5);
  }

  // looking for of() with > 5 entries? Use the builder instead.

  /**
   * Returns a new builder. The generated builder is equivalent to the builder created by the {@link
   * Builder} constructor.
   */

   * uncommon to specify {@code concurrencyLevel(1)} in order to achieve more deterministic eviction
   * behavior.
   *
   * <p>Note that future implementations may abandon segment locking in favor of more advanced
   * concurrency controls.
   *
   * @return this {@code CacheBuilder} instance (for chaining)
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code concurrencyLevel} is nonpositive

  // If the set has this many elements, it will "max out" the table size
  private static final int CUTOFF = (int) (MAX_TABLE_SIZE * DESIRED_LOAD_FACTOR);

  /**
   * Returns an array size suitable for the backing array of a hash table that uses open addressing
   * with linear probing in its implementation. The returned size is the smallest power of two that