Python biedt ondersteuning voor optionele "type hints" (ook wel "type annotaties" genoemd).

Deze **"type hints"** of annotaties zijn een speciale syntax waarmee het <abbr title="bijvoorbeeld: str, int, float, bool">type</abbr> van een variabele kan worden gedeclareerd.

Door types voor je variabelen te declareren, kunnen editors en hulpmiddelen je beter ondersteunen.

    void setUp() {
        // Common setup if needed
    }

    /**
     * Test for unwrap() method with matching type.
     * Verifies that unwrap returns the correct instance when the type matches.
     */
    @Test
    void testUnwrap_withMatchingType() {
        // Create a custom SmbTree type for testing
        CustomSmbTree customTree = mock(CustomSmbTree.class);

     *
     * @param type
     *            the type
     * @param map
     *            a {@link Map} with type variables as keys and type arguments as values for the parameterized type
     * @return a {@link ParameterizedClassDesc} representing the type
     */
    protected static ParameterizedClassDesc createParameterizedClassDesc(final Type type, final Map<TypeVariable<?>, Type> map) {

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    /** Log type constant for zero-click search aggregation. */
    public static final String LOG_TYPE_SEARCH_ZEROCLICK = "search_zeroclick_agg";

    /** Log type constant for click logs. */
    public static final String LOG_TYPE_CLICK = "click";

    /** Log type constant for click count aggregation. */
    public static final String LOG_TYPE_CLICK_COUNT = "click_count_agg";

    /** Log type constant for favorite logs. */