constraints.DecimalMin.message  = {item} muss größer ${inclusive == true ? 'oder gleich ' : 'als '}{value} sein.
constraints.Digits.message      = {item} is numeric value out of bounds (<{integer} digits>.<{fraction} digits> expected).
constraints.Future.message      = {item} muss in der Zukunft liegen.
constraints.Max.message         = {item} muss kleiner oder gleich {value} sein.
constraints.Min.message         = {item} muss größer oder gleich {value} sein.

            <caution>
                <para>Note: This property is <ulink url="../userguide/feature_lifecycle.html">incubating</ulink> and may change in a future version of Gradle.</para>
            </caution>
            <para>prop2 comment</para>
        </section>
    </section>
</chapter>'''
    }

    *   Best practice for version 1.9 and future versions is to explicitly set a cloud-provider. See [the documentation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/getting-started-guides/scratch/#cloud-providers)
*   The kubeadm `--skip-preflight-checks` flag is now deprecated and will be removed in a future release.

  - The `--containerized` flag is deprecated and will be removed in a future release ([#74267](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/74267), [@dims](https://github.com/dims))

- hyperkube
  - The `--make-symlinks` flag is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. ([#74975](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/74975), [@dims](https://github.com/dims))
- API

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")

          <association>
            <type>Repository</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment><![CDATA[ This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own. ]]></comment>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>
      <name>Activation</name>

  EXPECT_NE(TF_GetCode(status.get()), TF_CANCELLED);
  EXPECT_EQ(TF_GetCode(status.get()), TF_INVALID_ARGUMENT);
  EXPECT_THAT(TF_Message(status.get()), HasSubstr("assertion failed"));

  // Note that future collectives with the same context do not work at the
  // moment; once canceled, the collective executor requires the program to be
  // restarted / context to be reset.
}

	CrawlerSubSys: ScannerSubSys,
	// Add future sub-system renames
}

const ( // deprecated keys
	apiReplicationWorkers       = "replication_workers"
	apiReplicationFailedWorkers = "replication_failed_workers"
)

// map of subsystem to deleted keys
var deletedSubSysKeys = map[string][]string{
	APISubSys: {apiReplicationWorkers, apiReplicationFailedWorkers},
	// Add future sub-system deleted keys
}

        this.tlsVersions = tlsVersions.copyOf() as Array<String> // Defensive copy.
      }

    @Deprecated(
      "since OkHttp 3.13 all TLS-connections are expected to support TLS extensions.\n" +
        "In a future release setting this to true will be unnecessary and setting it to false\n" +
        "will have no effect.",
    )
    fun supportsTlsExtensions(supportsTlsExtensions: Boolean) =
      apply {