Mas antes disso, controlar código assíncrono era bem mais complexo e difícil.

Nas versões anteriores do Python, você poderia utilizar threads ou <a href="https://www.gevent.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Gevent</a>. Mas o código é bem mais complexo de entender, debugar, e pensar sobre.

Nas versões anteriores do NodeJS / Navegador JavaScript, você utilizaria "callbacks". O que leva ao "inferno do callback".

                    pomContent.contains("<groupId>com.example</groupId>"),
                    "Expected " + pomContent + " to contain " + "<groupId>com.example</groupId>");
            // Note: The exact modifications depend on which strategies are applicable
            // This test mainly verifies that apply goal can modify files
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Multi-module Projects")
    class MultiModuleTests {

 * method.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and any collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
public abstract class ForwardingSortedMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object>
    extends ForwardingMultiset<E> implements SortedMultiset<E> {

   The root credentials can now be changed easily.

> Does this mean I need an enterprise KMS setup to run MinIO (securely)?

No, MinIO does not depend on any third-party KMS provider. You have three options here:

- Run MinIO without a KMS. In this case all IAM data will be stored in plain-text.
- Run MinIO with a single secret key. MinIO supports a static cryptographic key

 * directory to a method in the application interface?
 *
 * - research extension points versus plugins
 *
 * from igor: two plugins A and B, both depend on the same library but use different versions, say
 * lib 1.0 and lib 2.0 when debugger hits a breakpoint inside a class from the library, IDE needs to
 * know which version of library the class comes from
 */

 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 12.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ForwardingNavigableSet<E extends @Nullable Object>

So, this way you will probably have cleaner code.

///

If you used to rely on this behavior, now you should create the resources for background tasks inside the background task itself, and use internally only data that doesn't depend on the resources of dependencies with `yield`.

            // continue the build
        } else if (MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_FAIL_AT_END.equals(rootSession.getReactorFailureBehavior())) {
            // continue the build but ban all projects that depend on the failed one
            buildContext.getReactorBuildStatus().blackList(mavenProject);
        } else if (MavenExecutionRequest.REACTOR_FAIL_FAST.equals(rootSession.getReactorFailureBehavior())) {

    try {
      new NullPointerTester().testInstanceMethods(instance, visibility);
    } catch (AssertionError expected) {
      return;
    }
    fail("Should detect problem in " + instance.getClass().getSimpleName());
  }

  private static void shouldFail(Object instance) {
    shouldFail(instance, Visibility.PACKAGE);
    shouldFail(instance, Visibility.PROTECTED);

                            "Skipping step {} because one or more predecessors did not execute successfully", step);
                }
                // Recursively call executePlan to process steps that depend on this one
                executePlan();
            }
        }

        private void executePlan() {
            // Even if the build is halted, we still want to execute TEARDOWN and after:* steps