* prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3236
       */

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3236
       */

   * true when removing a connection from the pool; otherwise a racing caller might get it from the
   * pool when it shouldn't. Symmetrically, this must always be checked before returning a
   * connection from the pool.
   *
   * Once true this is always true. Guarded by this.
   */
  var noNewExchanges = false

  /**

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("CatchingUnchecked") // sneaky checked exception
  protected final boolean supportsValuesHashCode(Map<K, V> map) {
    // get the first non-null value
    Collection<V> values = map.values();
    for (V value : values) {
      if (value != null) {
        try {
          int unused = value.hashCode();
        } catch (Exception e) { // sneaky checked exception
          return false;
        }

     *
     * <p><b>Note:</b> in general, code should assume that the string form returned by {@code
     * ToStringHelper} for a given object may change. In particular, the list of types which are
     * checked for emptiness is subject to change. We currently check {@code CharSequence}s, {@code
     * Collection}s, {@code Map}s, optionals (including Guava's), and arrays.
     *
     * @since 33.4.0
     */

# ==============================================================================
setup_file() {
    bazel version  # Start the bazel server
}

# Do a bazel query specifically for the licenses checker. It searches for
# targets matching the provided query, which start with // or @ but not
# //tensorflow (so it looks for //third_party, //external, etc.), and then

		})

		for _, pet := range users2[2].Pets[0:2] {
			if pet.Toy.Name != "" {
				t.Errorf("No toy should for user %v's pet %v but got %v", 3, pet.Name, pet.Toy.Name)
			}
		}

		CheckPet(t, *users2[2].Pets[2], *users[2].Pets[2])
	}
}

func TestPreloadEmptyData(t *testing.T) {
	user := *GetUser("user_without_associations", Config{})
	DB.Create(&user)

		return nil
	})
}

// listPath will return the requested entries.
// If no more entries are in the listing io.EOF is returned,
// otherwise nil or an unexpected error is returned.
// The listPathOptions given will be checked and modified internally.
// Required important fields are Bucket, Prefix, Separator.
// Other important fields are Limit, Marker.
// List ID always derived from the Marker.

          ? delegate.keySet().toArray()
          : ObjectArrays.copyAsObjectArray(requireKeys(), 0, size);
    }

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
    public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
      if (needsAllocArrays()) {
        if (a.length > 0) {
          @Nullable Object[] unsoundlyCovariantArray = a;

    /*
     * Inputs are <every possible 10-character string of characters "a./">
     *
     * Expected outputs are generated by the code itself, but they've been
     * checked against the inputs under Bash in order to confirm that the two
     * forms are equivalent (though not necessarily minimal, though we hope this
     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *