* junk. We need to bump up the wordCount here so that this method returns
                 * the correct number of bytes for signing purposes. Otherwise we get a
                 * signing verification failure.
                 */
                if (command == SMB_COM_NT_CREATE_ANDX && ((SmbComNTCreateAndXResponse)this).isExtended)
                    wordCount += 8;
            }

	Metadata      []BatchJobKV  `yaml:"metadata,omitempty" json:"metadata"`
	KMSKeyID      string        `yaml:"kmskeyid" json:"kmskey"`
}

// BatchKeyRotateNotification success or failure notification endpoint for each job attempts
type BatchKeyRotateNotification struct {
	Endpoint string `yaml:"endpoint" json:"endpoint"`
	Token    string `yaml:"token" json:"token"`
}

| `minio_cluster_kms_request_error`   | Number of KMS requests that failed due to some error. (HTTP 4xx status code).            |
| `minio_cluster_kms_request_failure` | Number of KMS requests that failed due to some internal failure. (HTTP 5xx status code). |
| `minio_cluster_kms_request_success` | Number of KMS requests that succeeded.                                                   |

    }

    /*
     * It's unlikely that any operations would fail by throwing an exception, but let's check them
     * just to be safe.
     *
     * The real purpose of this test is to produce a TSAN failure if MapIteratorCache is unsafe for
     * reads from multiple threads -- unsafe, in fact, even in the absence of a concurrent write.
     * The specific problem we had was unsafe reads of lastEntryReturnedBySomeIterator. (To fix the

	"time"

	"github.com/minio/madmin-go/v3"
)

// Returns the latest updated FileInfo files and error in case of failure.
func getLatestFileInfo(ctx context.Context, partsMetadata []FileInfo, defaultParityCount int, errs []error) (FileInfo, error) {
	// There should be at least half correct entries, if not return failure
	expectedRQuorum := len(partsMetadata) / 2
	if defaultParityCount == 0 {

    } catch (AssertionFailedError expected) {
      for (String message : expectedMessages) {
        assertThat(expected.getMessage()).contains(message);
      }
      return;
    }
    fail("expected failure not reported");
  }

  private class ForwardingRunnable implements Runnable {

    private final Runnable runnable;

    ForwardingRunnable(Runnable runnable) {
      this.runnable = runnable;
    }

server in a given timeframe for whatever reasons (networking issue, machine
failure, etc.). Normally when kube-up script will encounter even one NotReady
node it will fail, even though the cluster most likely will be working. We
added an environmental variable to kube-up ALLOWED\_NOTREADY\_NODES that
defines the number of nodes that if not Ready in time won’t cause kube-up
failure.
  * “kubectl rolling-update” only supports Replication Controllers (it doesn’t

#                                      ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure=Login fehlgeschlagen.
errors.app.illegal.transition=Unzulässige Wertänderung, bitte erneut versuchen.
errors.app.db.already.deleted=Bearbeitungskonflikt, bitte erneut versuchen.

     */
    long getDfsTtl ();


    /**
     * 
     * Property <tt>jcifs.smb.client.dfs.strictView</tt> (boolean, default false)
     * 
     * @return whether a authentication failure during DFS resolving will throw an exception
     */
    boolean isDfsStrictView ();


    /**
     * 
     * Property <tt>jcifs.smb.client.dfs.disabled</tt> (boolean, default false)
     * 

    // since the putIfAbsent returned a zero, we'll try to replace...
    when(backingMap.replace(eq(KEY), eq(existingZero), isA(AtomicInteger.class))).thenReturn(false);
    // ...and then putIfAbsent. Simulate failure on both
    when(backingMap.putIfAbsent(eq(KEY), isA(AtomicInteger.class))).thenReturn(existing);

    // next map.get()
    when(backingMap.get(KEY)).thenReturn(existingZero);