e is ProtocolException -> false

    // If there was an interruption or timeout (SocketTimeoutException), don't recover.
    // For the socket connect timeout case we do not try the same host with a different
    // ConnectionSpec: we assume it is unreachable.
    e is InterruptedIOException -> false

    // If the problem was a CertificateException from the X509TrustManager, do not retry.

 * ## Why another URL model?
 *
 * Java includes both [java.net.URL][URL] and [java.net.URI][URI]. We offer a new URL
 * model to address problems that the others don't.
 *
 * ### Different URLs should be different
 *
 * Although they have different content, `java.net.URL` considers the following two URLs
 * equal, and the [equals()][Object.equals] method between them returns true:
 *
 *  * https://example.net/
 *

You can add more information about the parameter.

That information will be included in the generated OpenAPI and used by the documentation user interfaces and external tools.

/// note

Keep in mind that different tools might have different levels of OpenAPI support.

Some of them might not show all the extra information declared yet, although in most of the cases, the missing feature is already planned for development.

///

* The docs should include a source example file, not write Python directly in Markdown.
* If the source example(s) file can have different syntax for Python 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, there should be different versions of the file, and they should be shown in tabs in the docs.
* There should be tests testing the source example.
* Before the PR is applied, the new tests should fail.

    @Test
    public void testDifferentIpsIndependent() throws Exception {
        // Different IPs should have independent limits
        for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
            assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user1", "192.168.1." + i));
            rateLimiter.recordFailure("user1", "192.168.1." + i);
        }

        // All different IPs should still be allowed
        for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {

        assertEquals(2, tokensNull.size());
    }

    @Test
    public void testAnalyzeWithDifferentFields() {
        // Test analyze with different field settings
        String text = "test content";
        String lang = "en";

        // Test with different field names
        List<AnalyzeToken> tokensContent = analyzer.analyze(text, "content", lang);
        assertNotNull(tokensContent);

            when(parent.getLocator()).thenReturn(locator);
            when(locator.getURL()).thenReturn(new URL("file:/"));
            // Throw CIFSException with different cause
            CIFSException differentException = new CIFSException("different error");
            when(locator.getAddress()).thenThrow(differentException);

            // Act + Assert

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Not checking the CA bit created a vulnerability in old OkHttp releases. It is exploited by
   * triggering different chains to be discovered by the TLS engine and our chain cleaner. In this
   * attack there's several different chains.
   *
   *
   * The victim's gets a non-CA certificate signed by a CA, and pins the CA root and/or
   * intermediate. This is business as usual.
   *

    void testWriteSetupWireFormat() {
        byte[] dst = new byte[100];
        int result = response.writeSetupWireFormat(dst, 0);
        assertEquals(0, result);

        // Test with different offset
        result = response.writeSetupWireFormat(dst, 50);
        assertEquals(0, result);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeParametersWireFormat returns 0")

            assertEquals("Expected structureSize = 60", exception.getMessage());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 10, 20, 30 })
        @DisplayName("Should correctly read from different buffer offsets")
        void testReadBytesWireFormatWithDifferentOffsets(int offset) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Given
            byte[] buffer = new byte[100];