rn>` is set in the metadata with the timestamp of replication and ResetID. For saving iops, the objects which are re-replicated are not first set to `PENDING` state.

This is a slower operation that does not use replication queues and is designed to walk the namespace and replicate objects one at a time so as not to impede server load. Ideally, resync should not be initiated for multiple buckets simultaneously - progress of the syncing can be monitored by looking at `mc replicate resync status...

 *       <i>any</i> eight bits could be consistently used.
 *   <li><b>cryptographic:</b> certain hash functions such as {@link Hashing#sha512} are designed to
 *       make it as infeasible as possible to reverse-engineer the input that produced a given hash
 *       code, or even to discover <i>any</i> two distinct inputs that yield the same result. These

 *       <i>any</i> eight bits could be consistently used.
 *   <li><b>cryptographic:</b> certain hash functions such as {@link Hashing#sha512} are designed to
 *       make it as infeasible as possible to reverse-engineer the input that produced a given hash
 *       code, or even to discover <i>any</i> two distinct inputs that yield the same result. These

//     hang-around in-case we need some form of recovery.
type RenameDataResp struct {
	Sign       []byte `msg:"s"`
	OldDataDir string `msg:"od"` // contains '<uuid>', it is designed to be passed as value to Delete(bucket, pathJoin(object, dataDir))
}

const (
	checkPartUnknown int = iota

	// Changing the order can cause a data loss
	// when running two nodes with incompatible versions

This was designed this way mainly to allow using the same objects "yielded" by dependencies inside of background tasks, because the exit code would be executed after the background tasks were finished.

Bucket replication is designed to replicate selected objects in a bucket to a destination bucket.

* Be lightweight enough to not limit adoption.
  * This puts a much tighter budget on CPU, memory, latency, and throughput requirements than traditional Istio sidecars.

Ztunnel was not designed to be a feature-rich data plane.
Quite the opposite - an *aggressively* small feature set is the key feature that makes ztunnel viable.

---

"_If anyone is looking to build a production Python API, I would highly recommend **FastAPI**. It is **beautifully designed**, **simple to use** and **highly scalable**, it has become a **key component** in our API first development strategy and is driving many automations and services such as our Virtual TAC Engineer._"

  internal val flowControlListener: FlowControlListener = builder.flowControlListener

  /** Settings we communicate to the peer. */
  val okHttpSettings =
    Settings().apply {
      // Flow control was designed more for servers, or proxies than edge clients. If we are a client,
      // set the flow control window to 16MiB.  This avoids thrashing window updates every 64KiB, yet
      // small enough to avoid blowing up the heap.

- `mc admin update` is not supported and should be avoided in kubernetes/container environments, please upgrade containers by upgrading relevant container images.
- **We do not recommend upgrading one MinIO server at a time, the product is designed to support parallel upgrades please follow our recommended guidelines.**

## Explore Further

- [MinIO Erasure Code Overview](https://min.io/docs/minio/linux/operations/concepts/erasure-coding.html)