Algo como `/users/me` por exemplo, digamos que essa rota seja utilizada para pegar dados sobre o usuário atual.

E então você pode ter também uma rota `/users/{user_id}` para pegar dados sobre um usuário específico associado a um ID de usuário.

Porque as operações de rota são avaliadas em ordem, você precisa ter certeza que a rota para `/users/me` está sendo declarado antes da rota `/users/{user_id}`:

Helm charts `values.yaml` represent a complex user facing API that tends to grow uncontrollably over time
due to design choices in Helm.
The underlying Kubernetes resources we configure have 1000s of fields; given enough users and bespoke use cases,
eventually someone will want to customize every one of those fields.
If all fields are exposed in `values.yaml`, we end up with an massive API that is also likely worse than just using the Kubernetes API directly.

Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey` - secretKey of usersecretRef - `users[].existingSecret`...

Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey` - secretKey of usersecretRef - `users[].existingSecret`...

Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey` - secretKey of usersecretRef - `users[].existingSecret`...

    server: https://50.76.2.1:443
  name: local
contexts:
- context:
    cluster: local
    user: istio-cni
  name: istio-cni-context
current-context: istio-cni-context
kind: Config
preferences: {}
users:
- name: istio-cni
  user:

Tel que `/users/me`, disons pour récupérer les données sur l'utilisateur actuel.

Et vous avez un second chemin : `/users/{user_id}` pour récupérer de la donnée sur un utilisateur spécifique grâce à son identifiant d'utilisateur

Les *fonctions de chemin* étant évaluées dans l'ordre, il faut s'assurer que la fonction correspondant à `/users/me` est déclarée avant celle de `/users/{user_id}` :

```Python hl_lines="6  11"

        expires_delta=access_token_expires,
    )
    return Token(access_token=access_token, token_type="bearer")


@app.get("/users/me/", response_model=User)
async def read_users_me(current_user: User = Depends(get_current_active_user)):
    return current_user


@app.get("/users/me/items/")
async def read_own_items(
    current_user: User = Security(get_current_active_user, scopes=["items"]),
):

    )
    return Token(access_token=access_token, token_type="bearer")


@app.get("/users/me/", response_model=User)
async def read_users_me(
    current_user: Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_active_user)],
):
    return current_user


@app.get("/users/me/items/")
async def read_own_items(
    current_user: Annotated[User, Security(get_current_active_user, scopes=["items"])],
):

On Windows, [Current] has been made considerably faster when
the current user is joined to a slow domain, which is the
usual case for many corporate users. The new implementation
performance is now in the order of milliseconds, compared to
the previous implementation which could take several seconds,