// Some of this is fixed in jdk11 (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198692) but
        // not all.  See the test cases for examples on how this can happen.
        try {
          ((Thread) currentRunner).interrupt();
        } finally {
          Runnable prev = getAndSet(DONE);
          if (prev == PARKED) {
            LockSupport.unpark((Thread) currentRunner);

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image02.png">

## Editor support

In your editor, inside your function you will get type hints and completion everywhere (this wouldn't happen if you received a `dict` instead of a Pydantic model):

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image03.png">

You also get error checks for incorrect type operations:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image04.png">

http://ExAmPlE.CoM http://other.com/ s:http p:/ h:example.com

# Spaces should fail
http://example\sexample.com

# This should fail
http://Goo%20\sgoo%7C|.com

# U+3000 is mapped to U+0020 (space) which is disallowed
http://GOO\u00a0\u3000goo.com

# Other types of space (no-break, zero-width, zero-width-no-break) are
# name-prepped away to nothing.
# U+200B, U+2060, and U+FEFF, are ignored

          Reflection.newProxy(Map.class, new CheckSetUpInvocationHandler(map, setUpRan));
      return proxy;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Intercepts calls to a {@code Map} to check that {@code setUpRan} is true when they happen. Then
   * forwards the calls to the underlying {@code Map}.
   */
  private static class CheckSetUpInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler, Serializable {
    private final Map<String, String> map;

 *       deadlock situation, and the appropriate Policy is executed.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Note that detection of potential deadlock does not necessarily indicate that deadlock will
 * happen, as it is possible that higher level application logic prevents the cyclic lock
 * acquisition from occurring. One example of a false positive is:
 *
 * <pre>
 * LockA -&gt; LockB -&gt; LockC

     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If this field's value == currentThread, we know that it's up to date, because write
     *       operations in a thread always happen-before subsequent read operations in the same
     *       thread
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because of unsafe publication, we know that it isn't the

   * thereof.
   *
   * @param formal The type whose type variables or itself is mapped to other type(s). It's almost
   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet

		key := msgPath(fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.", bucket, domainName), c.prefixPath)
		records, err := c.list(key, false)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
		// Make sure we have record.Key is empty
		// this can only happen when record.Key
		// has bucket entry with exact prefix
		// match any record.Key which do not
		// match the prefixes we skip them.
		for _, record := range records {
			if record.Key != "" {
				continue
			}

   * Futures#addCallback addCallback()}.
   *
   * <p>Memory consistency effects: Actions in a thread prior to adding a listener <a
   * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-17.html#jls-17.4.5">
   * <i>happen-before</i></a> its execution begins, perhaps in another thread.
   *
   * <p>Guava implementations of {@code ListenableFuture} promptly release references to listeners
   * after executing them.
   *

   * Futures#addCallback addCallback()}.
   *
   * <p>Memory consistency effects: Actions in a thread prior to adding a listener <a
   * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-17.html#jls-17.4.5">
   * <i>happen-before</i></a> its execution begins, perhaps in another thread.
   *
   * <p>Guava implementations of {@code ListenableFuture} promptly release references to listeners
   * after executing them.
   *