*  Fix: Provide actionable advice when the exchange is non-null. Prior to 3.14, OkHttp would
    silently leak connections when an interceptor retries without closing the response body. With
    3.14 we detect this problem but the exception was not helpful.

## Version 3.14.0

_2019-03-14_

 *  **This release deletes the long-deprecated `OkUrlFactory` and `OkApacheClient` APIs.** These

   *       into the other buffer (userspace). Note that if the file is very large, a naive
   *       implementation will effectively put the whole file in memory. On many systems with paging
   *       and virtual memory, this is not a problem - because it is mapped read-only, the kernel
   *       can always page it to disk "for free". However, on systems where killing processes
   *       happens all the time in normal conditions (i.e., android) the OS must make a tradeoff

        getProject(f1);

        // it's the building of the grandchild project, having already cached the child project
        // (but not the parent project), which causes the problem.
        getProject(f2);
    }

    @Disabled("Maven 4 does not allow duplicate plugin declarations")
    @Test
    void testDuplicatePluginDefinitionsMerged() throws Exception {

    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(1) // New connection.
  }

  /**
   * We had a bug where we'd perform infinite retries of route that fail with connection shutdown
   * errors. The problem was that the logic that decided whether to reuse a route didn't track
   * certain HTTP/2 errors. https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/5547
   */
  @Test
  fun noRecoveryFromTwoRefusedStreams() {
    server.enqueue(

   *   ClassLoader that is sometimes used as a system classloader. That's a problem because
   *   method-reference linking tries to look up the system classloader, and it fails because there
   *   isn't one yet.
   *
   * - lambda: Outside Google, we got a report of a similar problem in
   *   https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6565
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("AnonymousToLambda")

      if (uid == null) {
        // One or more integer values could be skipped in the event of a race
        // to generate a UID for the same object from multiple threads, but
        // that shouldn't be a problem.
        uid = counter.getAndIncrement();
        Integer alreadySet = uids.putIfAbsent(obj, uid);
        if (alreadySet != null) {
          uid = alreadySet;
        }
      }
      return uid;
    }

            } catch (PluginManagerException e) {
                // extensions realm is expected to be fully setup at this point
                // any exception means a problem in maven code, not a user error
                throw new IllegalStateException(e);
            }

            ClassRealm pluginRealm = extensionRecord.getRealm();

   * GWT has a bug: It refuses to copy from an E[] to an Object[] when E is an
   * interface type.
   */
  // TODO: test other collections for this problem
  public void testOf_gwtArraycopyBug() {
    /*
     * The test requires:
     *
     * 1) An interface I extending Comparable<I> so that the created array is of

Daraus resultiert das Ei-und-Huhn-Problem: Wie ruft man die erste `async` Funktion auf?

Wenn Sie mit **FastAPI** arbeiten, müssen Sie sich darüber keine Sorgen machen, da diese „erste“ Funktion Ihre *Pfadoperation-Funktion* sein wird und FastAPI weiß, was zu tun ist.

And it generates OpenAPI schemas.

That's how it works in Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

But then, we have again the problem of having a micro-syntax, inside of a Python string (a big YAML).