app = FastAPI()

router = APIRouter()


@router.get("/users/{id}")
def read_user(segment: str, id: str):
    return {"segment": segment, "id": id}


app.include_router(router, prefix="/{segment}")


client = TestClient(app)


def test_get():
    response = client.get("/seg/users/foo")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text

      }
    }
  }

  // TODO(user): Support Sleeper somehow (wrapper or interface method)?
  /**
   * Invokes {@code unit.}{@link TimeUnit#sleep(long) sleep(sleepFor)} uninterruptibly.
   *
   * @since NEXT (but since 28.0 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  @SuppressWarnings("Java7ApiChecker")
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using Duration.

		Vars:   []interface{}{clause.Table{Name: "users"}, clause.Column{Name: "id"}, clause.Expr{SQL: "int"}, clause.Column{Name: "name"}, clause.Expr{SQL: "text"}},
		Result: "create table `users` (`id` int, `name` text)",
	}}

	for idx, result := range results {
		t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("case #%v", idx), func(t *testing.T) {
			user, _ := schema.Parse(&tests.User{}, &sync.Map{}, db.NamingStrategy)

    without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

   * non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */
  public UncheckedExecutionException(@CheckForNull String message, @CheckForNull Throwable cause) {
    super(message, cause);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new instance with {@code null} as its detail message and the given cause. Prefer to
   * provide a non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */

		Result  string
		Vars    []interface{}
	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Delete{}, clause.From{}},
			"DELETE FROM `users`", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Delete{Modifier: "LOW_PRIORITY"}, clause.From{}},
			"DELETE LOW_PRIORITY FROM `users`", nil,
		},
	}

	for idx, result := range results {
		t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("case #%v", idx), func(t *testing.T) {

async def create_item(item: Item):
    return item


@app.get("/items/", tags=["items"])
async def read_items():
    return [{"name": "Foo", "price": 42}]


@app.get("/users/", tags=["users"])
async def read_users():

async def get_items():
    return [
        {"name": "Plumbus", "price": 3},
        {"name": "Portal Gun", "price": 9001},
    ]


@app.post("/users/", response_model=ResponseMessage, tags=["users"])
async def create_user(user: User):

		Clauses []clause.Interface
		Result  string
		Vars    []interface{}
	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Insert{}},
			"INSERT INTO `users`", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Insert{Modifier: "LOW_PRIORITY"}},
			"INSERT LOW_PRIORITY INTO `users`", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Insert{Table: clause.Table{Name: "products"}, Modifier: "LOW_PRIORITY"}},

Например, `/users/me`. Предположим, что это путь для получения данных о текущем пользователе.

У вас также может быть путь `/users/{user_id}`, чтобы получить данные о конкретном пользователе по его ID.

Поскольку *операции пути* выполняются в порядке их объявления, необходимо, чтобы путь для `/users/me` был объявлен раньше, чем путь для `/users/{user_id}`:


```Python hl_lines="6  11"