* as a single request/response exchange.
 *
 * ## Modern TLS
 *
 * There are trade-offs when selecting which options to include when negotiating a secure connection
 * to a remote host. Newer TLS options are quite useful:
 *
 *  * Server Name Indication (SNI) enables one IP address to negotiate secure connections for
 *    multiple domain names.
 *

import java.util.Set;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * CompactHashMap is an implementation of a Map. All optional operations (put and remove) are
 * supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash

 * </p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@code PRE_PROCESSING} - Represents the pre-processing state.</li>
 *   <li>{@code POST_PROCESSING} - Represents the post-processing state.</li>
 *   <li>{@code NO_URL_IN_QUEUE} - Indicates that there are no URLs in the queue.</li>
 *   <li>{@code WAIT_NEW_URL} - Indicates that the crawler is waiting for new URLs.</li>
 * </ul>
 */
public interface IntervalController {
    /** Constant representing the pre-processing state. */

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link Collector} that accumulates elements into an {@code ImmutableMap} whose keys
   * and values are the result of applying the provided mapping functions to the input elements.
   *
   * <p>If the mapped keys contain duplicates (according to {@link Object#equals(Object)}), the
   * values are merged using the specified merging function. If the merging function returns {@code

 * "The .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security" (which is also
 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing
 * the operation and the desired access bits are compared to the SID
 * and access mask of each ACE. If the SID matches, the allow/deny flags
 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"
 * ACE and <i>any</i> of the desired access bits match bits in the access

 * "The .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security" (which is also
 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing
 * the operation and the desired access bits are compared to the SID
 * and access mask of each ACE. If the SID matches, the allow/deny flags
 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"
 * ACE and <i>any</i> of the desired access bits match bits in the access

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }

 * "The .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security" (which is also
 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing
 * the operation and the desired access bits are compared to the SID
 * and access mask of each ACE. If the SID matches, the allow/deny flags
 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"
 * ACE and <i>any</i> of the desired access bits match bits in the access

But you don't have to worry about them either, incoming dicts are converted automatically and your output is converted automatically to JSON too.

## Bodies of arbitrary `dict`s { #bodies-of-arbitrary-dicts }

You can also declare a body as a `dict` with keys of some type and values of some other type.

This way, you don't have to know beforehand what the valid field/attribute names are (as would be the case with Pydantic models).