{"TrimSuffix", nil, "", nil},
	{"TrimSuffix", []byte{}, "", []byte{}},
	{"TrimSuffix", []byte{'a'}, "a", []byte{}},
	{"TrimSuffix", []byte("☺"), "☺", []byte{}},
}

func TestTrim(t *testing.T) {
	toFn := func(name string) (func([]byte, string) []byte, func([]byte, []byte) []byte) {
		switch name {
		case "Trim":
			return Trim, nil
		case "TrimLeft":
			return TrimLeft, nil
		case "TrimRight":

mij
uit
der
daar
haar
naar
heb
hoe
heeft
hebben
deze
u
want
nog
zal
me
zij
nu
ge
geen
omdat
iets
worden
toch
al
waren
veel
meer
doen
toen
moet
ben
zonder
kan
hun
dus
alles
onder
ja
eens
hier
wie
werd
altijd
doch
wordt
wezen
kunnen
ons
zelf
tegen
na
reeds
wil
kon
niets
uw

http://example.com/foo/..bar  s:http h:example.com p:/foo/..bar
http://example.com/foo/bar/../ton  s:http h:example.com p:/foo/ton
http://example.com/foo/bar/../ton/../../a  s:http h:example.com p:/a
http://example.com/foo/../../..  s:http h:example.com p:/
http://example.com/foo/../../../ton  s:http h:example.com p:/ton
http://example.com/foo/%2e  s:http h:example.com p:/foo/

sobretot
sóc
solament
sols
son 
són
sons 
sota
sou
t'ha
t'han
t'he
ta
tal
també
tampoc
tan
tant
tanta
tantes
teu
teus
teva
teves
ton
tons
tot
tota
totes
tots
un
una
unes
uns
us
va
vaig
vam
van
vas
veu
vosaltres
vostra
vostre

le
leur
lui
ma
mais
me
même
mes
moi
mon
ne
nos
notre
nous
on
ou
par
pas
pour
qu
que
qui
sa
se
ses
son
sur
ta
te
tes
toi
ton
tu
un
une
vos
votre
vous
c
d
j
l
à
m
n
s
t
y
été
étée
étées
étés
étant
suis
es
est
sommes
êtes
sont
serai
seras
sera
serons

  url: https://github.com/jujumilk3
ayr-ton:
  login: ayr-ton
  count: 2
  avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090517?u=5cf70a0e0f0dbf084e074e494aa94d7c91a46ba6&v=4
  url: https://github.com/ayr-ton
Kadermiyanyedi:
  login: Kadermiyanyedi
  count: 2

    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override

    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Byte) && Bytes.indexOf(array, (Byte) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Byte) {
        int i = Bytes.indexOf(array, (Byte) target, start, end);

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      return (target instanceof Boolean)
          && Booleans.indexOf(array, (Boolean) target, start, end) != -1;
    }

    @Override
    public int indexOf(@Nullable Object target) {
      // Overridden to prevent a ton of boxing
      if (target instanceof Boolean) {