import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.Mockito;

import jcifs.CIFSContext;
import jcifs.Configuration;
import jcifs.Credentials;

/**
 * Security-focused test cases for SmbSessionImpl to verify race condition fixes.
 */
public class SmbSessionImplSecurityTest {

    private CIFSContext mockContext;
    private SmbTransportImpl mockTransport;
    private Configuration mockConfig;

@J2ObjCIncompatible // java.nio.file
public enum RecursiveDeleteOption {
  /**
   * Specifies that the recursive delete should not throw an exception when it can't be guaranteed
   * that it can be done securely, without vulnerability to race conditions (i.e. when the file
   * system does not support {@link SecureDirectoryStream}).
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> On a file system that supports symbolic links, it is possible for an

 *
 *  3. Attempt plans from prior connect attempts for this call. These occur as either follow-ups to
 *     failed connect attempts (such as trying the next [ConnectionSpec]), or as attempts that lost
 *     a race in fast follow-up.
 *
 *  4. If there's no existing connection, make a list of routes (which may require blocking DNS
 *     lookups) and attempt new connections to them. When failures occur, retries iterate the

  internal val connectionSpecIndex: Int,
  internal val isTlsFallback: Boolean,
) : RoutePlanner.Plan,
  ExchangeCodec.Carrier {
  /** True if this connect was canceled; typically because it lost a race. */
  @Volatile private var canceled = false

  // These properties are initialized by connect() and never reassigned.

  /** The low-level TCP socket. */
  private var rawSocket: JavaNetSocket? = null

  /**

 * Don't start a new attempt until 250 ms after the most recent attempt was started.
 * Keep whichever TCP connection succeeds first and cancel all the others.
 * Race TCP only. Only attempt a TLS handshake on the winning TCP connection.

      "plan 1 TLS connected",
    )

    taskFaker.assertNoMoreTasks()
  }

  /**
   * This test performs two races:
   *
   *  * The first race is between plan0 and plan1, with a 250 ms head start for plan0.
   *  * The second race is between plan2 and plan3, with a 250 ms head start for plan2.
   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.

    printEvent("callStart");
  }

  @Override public void callEnd(Call call) {
    printEvent("callEnd");
  }

  ...
}
```

We can use this listener to race a pair of concurrent HTTP requests:

```java
Request washingtonPostRequest = new Request.Builder()
    .url("https://www.washingtonpost.com/")
    .build();

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *

   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */
  @LazyInit private @Nullable List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types

    /*
     * The initialization of seenExceptionsField has to be more complicated than we'd like. The
     * simple approach would be for each caller CAS it from null to a Set populated with its
     * exception. But there's another race: If the first thread fails with an exception and a second
     * thread immediately fails with the same exception:
     *
     * Thread1: calls setException(), which returns true, context switch before it can CAS