// There are a few design constraints to consider
  // * We want to be responsive to small timeouts, unpark() has non trivial latency overheads (I
  //   have observed 12 micros on 64-bit linux systems to wake up a parked thread). So if the
  //   timeout is small we shouldn't park(). This needs to be traded off with the cpu overhead of
  //   spinning, so we use SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS which is what AbstractQueuedSynchronizer uses for
  //   similar purposes.

  // There are a few design constraints to consider
  // * We want to be responsive to small timeouts, unpark() has non trivial latency overheads (I
  //   have observed 12 micros on 64-bit linux systems to wake up a parked thread). So if the
  //   timeout is small we shouldn't park(). This needs to be traded off with the cpu overhead of
  //   spinning, so we use SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS which is what AbstractQueuedSynchronizer uses for
  //   similar purposes.

Blocking APIs may be inefficient because you hold a thread idle while waiting on the network. Threads are expensive because they have both a memory overhead and a context-switching overhead.

#### Framed protocols

 * along with information about the read operation.
 *
 * @author mbechler
 */
public class Smb2ReadResponse extends ServerMessageBlock2Response {

    /**
     * Protocol overhead size for SMB2 read response
     */
    public static final int OVERHEAD = Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 16;

    private int dataRemaining;
    private int dataLength;
    private final byte[] outputBuffer;
    private final int outputBufferOffset;

    * Wenn Sie Uvicorn vergleichen, vergleichen Sie es mit Anwendungsservern wie Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, usw.
* **Starlette**:

 *
 * @author mbechler
 *
 */
public class Smb2QueryInfoResponse extends ServerMessageBlock2Response {

    /**
     * Protocol overhead size for SMB2 query info response
     */
    public static final int OVERHEAD = Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 8;

    private final byte expectInfoType;
    private final byte expectInfoClass;
    private Decodable info;

    /**

    * If you didn't use FastAPI and used Starlette directly (or another tool, like Sanic, Flask, Responder, etc) you would have to implement all the data validation and serialization yourself. So, your final application would still have the same overhead as if it was built using FastAPI. And in many cases, this data validation and serialization...

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An iterator that transforms a backing iterator; for internal use. This avoids the object overhead
 * of constructing a {@link com.google.common.base.Function Function} for internal methods.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {
    // Don't use checkState(), because we don't want the overhead of generating the error message
    // unless it's actually going to be used; validate() is called for all set method calls, so it
    // needs to be fast.

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return delegate.hashCode();
  }

  private void validate() {
    // Don't use checkState(), because we don't want the overhead of generating the error message
    // unless it's actually going to be used; validate() is called for all set method calls, so it
    // needs to be fast.