* Transactions, Nested Transactions, Save Point, RollbackTo to Saved Point
* Context, Prepared Statement Mode, DryRun Mode
* Batch Insert, FindInBatches, Find To Map
* SQL Builder, Upsert, Locking, Optimizer/Index/Comment Hints, NamedArg, Search/Update/Create with SQL Expr
* Composite Primary Key
* Auto Migrations
* Logger
* Extendable, flexible plugin API: Database Resolver (Multiple Databases, Read/Write Splitting) / Prometheus…

//
// This supports both standard clauses (clause.OrderBy, clause.Limit, clause.Where) and more
// advanced techniques like specifying lock strength and optimizer hints. See the
// [docs] for more depth.
//
//	// add a simple limit clause
//	db.Clauses(clause.Limit{Limit: 1}).Find(&User{})
//	// tell the optimizer to use the `idx_user_name` index
//	db.Clauses(hints.UseIndex("idx_user_name")).Find(&User{})
//	// specify the lock strength to UPDATE

		stmt              = db.Statement
		resetBuildClauses bool
	)

	if len(stmt.BuildClauses) == 0 {
		stmt.BuildClauses = p.Clauses
		resetBuildClauses = true
	}

	if optimizer, ok := stmt.Dest.(StatementModifier); ok {
		optimizer.ModifyStatement(stmt)
	}

	if db.DefaultContextTimeout > 0 {
		if _, ok := stmt.Context.Deadline(); !ok {
			stmt.Context, _ = context.WithTimeout(stmt.Context, db.DefaultContextTimeout)
		}

    2.11.
*   `tf.keras.optimizers.experimental.Optimizer` will graduate in Release 2.11,
    which means `tf.keras.optimizers.Optimizer` will be an alias of
    `tf.keras.optimizers.experimental.Optimizer`. The current
    `tf.keras.optimizers.Optimizer` will continue to be supported as
    `tf.keras.optimizers.legacy.Optimizer`,
    e.g.,`tf.keras.optimizers.legacy.Adam`. Most users won't be affected by this

![Disable Advanced Profiling](../assets/images/******@****.***)


R8 / ProGuard
-------------

R8 and ProGuard are both code optimizers for `.class` files.

R8 is the [default optimizer][r8] in Android Studio 3.4 and newer. It works well with all
releases of OkHttp.

ProGuard was the previous default. We’re [tracking problems][proguard_problems] with interactions

				stmt.DB.Dialector.BindVarTo(writer, stmt, v)
			}
		}
	}
}

// AddClause add clause
func (stmt *Statement) AddClause(v clause.Interface) {
	if optimizer, ok := v.(StatementModifier); ok {
		optimizer.ModifyStatement(stmt)
	} else {
		name := v.Name()
		c := stmt.Clauses[name]
		c.Name = name
		v.MergeClause(&c)
		stmt.Clauses[name] = c
	}
}

         * can't use it, this `catch` block might now be necessary only:
         *
         * - in the Android flavor or anywhere else that users might be applying an optimizer that
         * might strip UnsafeComparator entirely. (TODO(cpovirk): Are we confident that optimizers
         * aren't stripping UnsafeComparator today? Should we have Proguard configuration for it?)
         *

   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a

   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a

    // Warning to maintainers: this implementation is highly optimized.
    int utf16Length = sequence.length();
    int utf8Length = utf16Length;
    int i = 0;

    // This loop optimizes for pure ASCII.
    while (i < utf16Length && sequence.charAt(i) < 0x80) {
      i++;
    }

    // This loop optimizes for chars less than 0x800.
    for (; i < utf16Length; i++) {
      char c = sequence.charAt(i);