Indexes","lt","gt","nth","radio","checkbox","file","password","image","submit","reset","parseOnly","tokens","soFar","preFilters","cached","combinator","base","skip","checkNonElements","doneName","oldCache","newCache","elementMatcher","matchers","condense","newUnmatched","mapped","setMatcher","postFilter","postFinder","postSelector","temp","matcherOut","preMap","postMap","preexisting","contexts","multipleContexts","matcherIn","matcherFromTokens","checkContext","leadingRelative","implicitRelative"...

Indexes","lt","gt","nth","radio","checkbox","file","password","image","submit","reset","parseOnly","tokens","soFar","preFilters","cached","combinator","base","skip","checkNonElements","doneName","oldCache","newCache","elementMatcher","matchers","condense","newUnmatched","mapped","setMatcher","postFilter","postFinder","postSelector","temp","matcherOut","preMap","postMap","preexisting","contexts","multipleContexts","matcherIn","matcherFromTokens","checkContext","leadingRelative","implicitRelative"...

    checkFromStringCase("google.com:25\t", 1, null, 99, false);
    checkFromStringCase("google.com:0x25 ", 1, null, 99, false);
  }

  public void testFromStringUnparseableNonsense() {
    // Some nonsense that causes parse failures.
    checkFromStringCase("[goo.gl]", 1, null, 99, false);
    checkFromStringCase("[goo.gl]:80", 1, null, 99, false);
    checkFromStringCase("[", 1, null, 99, false);

	}
	webhook := whs[0]
	for i := range webhook.Webhooks {
		wh := webhook.Webhooks[i]
		// this is an abomination, but if this isn't a per-revision webhook, we want to make it ineffectual
		// without deleting it. Add a nonsense match.
		wh.NamespaceSelector = util.NeverMatch
		wh.ObjectSelector = util.NeverMatch
		webhook.Webhooks[i] = wh
	}
	admit := client.AdmissionregistrationV1().MutatingWebhookConfigurations()

    .build();
```

Client Authentication
---------------------

The above scenario is representative of most TLS set ups: the client uses certificates to validate
the identity of a server. The converse is also possible. Here we create a server that authenticates
a client and a client that authenticates a server.

```java
// Create the root for client and server to trust. We could also use different roots for each!

  /**
   * The lifecycle states of a service.
   *
   * <p>The ordering of the {@link State} enum is defined such that if there is a state transition
   * from {@code A -> B} then {@code A.compareTo(B) < 0}. N.B. The converse is not true, i.e. if
   * {@code A.compareTo(B) < 0} then there is <b>not</b> guaranteed to be a valid state transition
   * {@code A -> B}.
   *
   * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code com.google.common.base.Service.State})

  /**
   * The lifecycle states of a service.
   *
   * <p>The ordering of the {@link State} enum is defined such that if there is a state transition
   * from {@code A -> B} then {@code A.compareTo(B) < 0}. N.B. The converse is not true, i.e. if
   * {@code A.compareTo(B) < 0} then there is <b>not</b> guaranteed to be a valid state transition
   * {@code A -> B}.
   *
   * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code com.google.common.base.Service.State})

public final class HostAndPort implements Serializable {
  /** Magic value indicating the absence of a port number. */
  private static final int NO_PORT = -1;

  /** Hostname, IPv4/IPv6 literal, or unvalidated nonsense. */
  private final String host;

  /** Validated port number in the range [0..65535], or NO_PORT */
  private final int port;

  /** True if the parsed host has colons, but no surrounding brackets. */

        return Optional.ofNullable(location);
    }

    /**
     * Returns the path type associated to the given {@code javax.tool} location.
     * This method is the converse of {@link #location()}.
     *
     * @param location identification of a path in the {@code javax.tool} API
     * @return Java path type associated to the given location
     */

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range