name: Comment on a closed issue

on:
  issue_comment:
    types: [created]

jobs:
  reconsider_closed_issue:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      issues: write
    steps:

            return;
        }

        Text comment = (Text) firstNode.getFirstChild();
        Matcher matcher = ACCESSOR_COMMENT_PATTERN.matcher(comment.getData());
        if (matcher.lookingAt()) {
            String theOrWhether = matcher.group(1).toLowerCase(Locale.US);
            comment.setData(StringUtils.capitalize(theOrWhether) + " " + comment.getData().substring(matcher.end()));
        }
    }

        )
        for comment in comments:
            if new_translation_message in comment.body:
                already_notified_comment = comment
            elif done_translation_message in comment.body:
                already_done_comment = comment
        logging.info(
            f"Already notified comment: {already_notified_comment}, already done comment: {already_done_comment}"
        )

				currKVS.Set(kv.Key, kv.Value)
			}
		}
	}

	for _, kv := range kvs {
		if kv.Key == Comment {
			// Skip comment and add it later.
			continue
		}
		currKVS.Set(kv.Key, kv.Value)
	}

	v, ok := kvs.Lookup(Comment)
	if ok {
		currKVS.Set(Comment, v)
	}

	hkvs := HelpSubSysMap[subSys]
	for _, hkv := range hkvs {
		var enabled bool
		if enableRequired {

your release note in the form `/issue/NUMBER`. A link to the issue in the text
will have this form (see below). If you don't want to mention the issue in the
text, add it as a comment:
```
<!-- go.dev/issue/12345 -->
```
If an accepted proposal is mentioned in a CL but not in the release notes, it will be
flagged as a TODO by the automated tooling. That is true even for proposals that add API.

```


### Code blocks with comments that don't follow pattern { #code-blocks-with-comments-without-pattern }

Fixer tool expects comments that follow specific pattern:

- For hash-style comments: comment starts with `# ` (hash following by whitespace) in the beginning of the string or after a whitespace.

    }

    /**
     * Checks if parts of the passed in comment can be used as header comment.
     * This method checks whether a header comment can be defined (i.e. whether
     * this is the first comment in the loaded file). If this is the case, it is
     * searched for the lates blank line. This line will mark the end of the
     * header comment. The return value is the index of the first line in the

    }

    /**
     * Checks if parts of the passed in comment can be used as header comment.
     * This method checks whether a header comment can be defined (i.e. whether
     * this is the first comment in the loaded file). If this is the case, it is
     * searched for the lates blank line. This line will mark the end of the
     * header comment. The return value is the index of the first line in the

        code = match.group("code").rstrip()
        comment = match.group("comment")
        return code, comment
    return line.rstrip(), None


def _split_slashes_comment(line: str) -> tuple[str, str | None]:
    match = SLASHES_COMMENT_RE.match(line)
    if match:
        code = match.group("code").rstrip()
        comment = match.group("comment")
        return code, comment
    return line, None

        discussion_commentors: dict[str, datetime] = {}
        for comment in discussion.comments.nodes:
            if (
                comment.minimizedReason not in MINIMIZED_COMMENTS_REASONS_TO_EXCLUDE
                and comment.author
            ):
                authors[comment.author.login] = comment.author
                if comment.author.login != discussion_author_name: