util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * The presence of this annotation on an API indicates that the method may not be used with
 * the <a href="http://www.gwtproject.org/">Google Web Toolkit</a> (GWT).
 *
 * <p>This annotation behaves identically to <a href=
 * "http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/core/shared/GwtIncompatible.html">the
 * {@code @GwtIncompatible} annotation in GWT itself</a>.

@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class Partially {
  /**
   * The presence of this annotation on an API indicates that the method <i>may</i> be used with the
   * <a href="http://www.gwtproject.org/">Google Web Toolkit</a> (GWT) but that it has <i>some
   * restrictions</i>.
   */
  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
  @Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR, ElementType.FIELD})
  @Documented

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * The presence of this annotation on a type indicates that the type may be used with the <a
 * href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/">Google Web Toolkit</a> (GWT). When applied to a method,
 * the return type of the method is GWT compatible. It's useful to indicate that an instance created
 * by factory methods has a GWT serializable type. In the following example,
 *
 * <pre>