private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockC;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockC;
  private ReentrantLock lock1;
  private ReentrantLock lock2;
  private ReentrantLock lock3;

    for (int i = 0; i < lockNestingDepth; i++) {
      plainLocks[i] = new ReentrantLock();
    }
    this.detectingLocks = new Lock[lockNestingDepth];
    for (int i = 0; i < lockNestingDepth; i++) {
      detectingLocks[i] = factory.newReentrantLock("Lock" + i);
    }
  }

  @Benchmark
  void unorderedPlainLocks(int reps) {
    lockAndUnlock(new ReentrantLock(), reps);
  }

  @Benchmark

  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName) {
    return newReentrantLock(lockName, false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@link ReentrantLock} with the given fairness policy. The {@code lockName} is used in
   * the warning or exception output to help identify the locks involved in the detected deadlock.
   */
  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName, boolean fair) {

  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName) {
    return newReentrantLock(lockName, false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@link ReentrantLock} with the given fairness policy. The {@code lockName} is used in
   * the warning or exception output to help identify the locks involved in the detected deadlock.
   */
  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName, boolean fair) {

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
          /*

    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
          /*

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

      new Supplier<Lock>() {
        @Override
        public Lock get() {
          return new ReentrantLock();
        }
      };

  private static final Supplier<Lock> FAIR_LOCK_SUPPLER =
      new Supplier<Lock>() {
        @Override
        public Lock get() {
          return new ReentrantLock(true);
        }
      };

  private static final Supplier<Semaphore> SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER =

      new Supplier<Lock>() {
        @Override
        public Lock get() {
          return new ReentrantLock();
        }
      };

  private static final Supplier<Lock> FAIR_LOCK_SUPPLER =
      new Supplier<Lock>() {
        @Override
        public Lock get() {
          return new ReentrantLock(true);
        }
      };

  private static final Supplier<Semaphore> SEMAPHORE_SUPPLER =