public void testEquals_otherListContainingNull() {
    List<E> other = new ArrayList<>(getSampleElements());
    other.set(other.size() / 2, null);
    assertFalse(
        "Two Lists should not be equal if exactly one of them has null at a given index.",
        getList().equals(other));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = CollectionSize.ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)

    /*
     * Even though it's weird to pass a defaultValue that is null, some callers do so. Those who
     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@CheckForNull Foo defaultValue)` method that returns

            Source rel = source.resolve(relPath);
            return rel != null ? new SourceWrapper(rel) : null;
        }

        @Override
        public URI getLocationURI() {
            Path path = source.getPath();
            return path != null ? path.toUri() : URI.create(source.getLocation());
        }
    }

  /**
   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs

        transformer.init();

        final Node pruneNode = transformer.pruneNode(document.cloneNode(true), null);
        assertEquals(getXmlString(document), getXmlString(pruneNode));
        ComponentUtil.setFessConfig(null);
    }

    public void test_pruneNode_removeNoScript() throws Exception {

                            {
                                "title": "Full Name",
                                "anyOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "null"}],
                            }
                        )
                        | IsDict(
                            # TODO: remove when deprecating Pydantic v1
                            {"title": "Full Name", "type": "string"}
                        ),
                    },

  }

  private fun makeClient(
    connectionSpec: ConnectionSpec? = null,
    tlsVersion: TlsVersion? = null,
    cipherSuites: List<CipherSuite>? = null,
  ): OkHttpClient {
    return this.client.newBuilder()
      .apply {
        if (connectionSpec != null) {
          connectionSpecs(
            listOf(
              ConnectionSpec.Builder(connectionSpec)

import okio.Options
import okio.Source
import okio.Timeout
import okio.buffer

/**
 * Reads a stream of [RFC 2046][rfc_2046] multipart body parts. Callers read parts one-at-a-time
 * until [nextPart] returns null. After calling [nextPart] any preceding parts should not be read.
 *
 * Typical use loops over the parts in sequence:
 *
 * ```kotlin
 * val response: Response = call.execute()

 *
 * <p>Another example is an iterator that skips over null elements in a backing iterator. This could
 * be implemented as:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * public static Iterator<String> skipNulls(final Iterator<String> in) {
 *   return new AbstractIterator<String>() {
 *     protected String computeNext() {
 *       while (in.hasNext()) {
 *         String s = in.next();
 *         if (s != null) {
 *           return s;
 *         }
 *       }

    waiter1.join();
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should still be blocked

    LockSupport.unpark(waiter2); // spurious wakeup
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should eventually re-park

    future.set(null);
    waiter2.join();
  }

  public void testRemoveWaiter_polling() throws Exception {
    final AbstractFuture<String> future = new AbstractFuture<String>() {};
    WaiterThread waiter = new WaiterThread(future);