* such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

   * executor. The listener will have the corresponding transition method called whenever the
   * service changes state. The listener will not have previous state changes replayed, so it is
   * suggested that listeners are added before the service starts.
   *
   * <p>{@code addListener} guarantees execution ordering across calls to a given listener but not

<div class="wrapper">
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/header.jsp"></jsp:include>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="suggest"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="elevateWord"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <div class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">

<div class="wrapper">
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/header.jsp"></jsp:include>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="suggest"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="elevateWord"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <div class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

   * comparator is not <i>consistent with equals</i>), the results of this method are undefined.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> Despite what the method name suggests, if {@code map} is an {@code
   * ImmutableClassToInstanceMap}, no copy will actually be performed.
   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if any key or value in {@code map} is null

 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed
 *       under all environments. We could fight this by fully qualifying the annotation, but the
 *       result will be verbose and attention-grabbing.

<div class="wrapper">
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/header.jsp"></jsp:include>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="suggest"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="elevateWord"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <div class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">

   * process in any way, for example being sent over RPC, or saved to disk. For a general-purpose,
   * non-cryptographic hash function that will never change behavior, we suggest {@link
   * #murmur3_128}.
   *
   * <p>Repeated calls to this method on the same loaded {@code Hashing} class, using the same value
   * for {@code minimumBits}, will return identically-behaving {@link HashFunction} instances.

Vous pouvez <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/issues/new/choose" class="external-link" target="_blank">créer une Issue</a> dans le dépôt GitHub, par exemple pour :

* Poser une question ou s'informer sur un problème.
* Suggérer une nouvelle fonctionnalité.

**Note** : si vous créez un problème, alors je vais vous demander d'aider aussi les autres. 😉

## Créer une Pull Request