* }
 *
 * <h3>Alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <h4>Frameworks</h4>
 *
 * <p>When chaining together a graph of asynchronous operations, you will often find it easier to
 * use a framework. Frameworks automate the process, often adding features like monitoring,
 * debugging, and cancellation. Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>

   * per call to submit() or submitAsync(), and each instance supports only one call to execute().
   *
   * <p>This class would certainly be simpler and easier to reason about if it were built with
   * ThreadLocal; however, ThreadLocal is not well optimized for the case where the ThreadLocal is
   * non-static, and is initialized/removed frequently - this causes churn in the Thread specific

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple times, in that case, it's a lot easier to handle.

/// tip

Also, keep in mind that depending on your setup, in some cases you **might not even need any previous steps** before starting your application.

        }
      }
    }
    for (Invokable<?, ?> factory : factories) {
      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)

HSPLokhttp3/internal/http2/Http2ExchangeCodec;->createRequestBody(Lokhttp3/Request;J)Lokio/Sink;
HSPLokhttp3/internal/http2/Http2ExchangeCodec;->finishRequest()V
HSPLokhttp3/internal/http2/Http2ExchangeCodec;->getCarrier()Lokhttp3/internal/http/ExchangeCodec$Carrier;

### Other forms of asynchronous code { #other-forms-of-asynchronous-code }

This style of using `async` and `await` is relatively new in the language.

But it makes working with asynchronous code a lot easier.

This same syntax (or almost identical) was also included recently in modern versions of JavaScript (in Browser and NodeJS).

But before that, handling asynchronous code was quite more complex and difficult.

À la place, en étant "asynchrone", une fois terminée, une tâche peut légèrement attendre (quelques microsecondes) que l'ordinateur / le programme finisse ce qu'il était en train de faire, et revienne récupérer le résultat.

        ":with_tpu_support_define",
        ":with_tpu_support_flag",
    ],
    visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)

# Specifies via a config setting if this is a mobile build or not, makes
# it easier to combine settings later.
selects.config_setting_group(
    name = "mobile",
    match_any = [
        ":android",
        ":chromiumos",

and less like C and C++, where the meaning of any program with a race
is entirely undefined, and the compiler may do anything at all.
Go's approach aims to make errant programs more reliable and easier to debug,
while still insisting that races are errors and that tools can diagnose and report them.
</p>

<h2 id="model">Memory Model</h2>

<p>
The following formal definition of Go's memory model closely follows

## Major Themes

- **Simplified User Experience**
  - Easier to get a cluster up and running (eg: `kubeadm`, intra-cluster bootstrapping)
  - Easier to understand a cluster (eg: API audit logs, server-based API defaults)
- **Stateful Application Support**
  - Enhanced persistence capabilities (eg: `StorageClasses`, new volume plugins)