* one from the pool. We must take the pooled connection because by taking it from the pool, we've
   * fully acquired it.
   *
   * This test yields threads to force the decision of plan1 to be deliberate and not lucky. In
   * particular, we set up this sequence of events:
   *
   *  1. take plan 0
   *  3. plan 0 connects
   *  4. finish taking plan 1
   *

spec:
  replicas: 1
`
	validIstioCanonical = `
apiVersion: v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: helloworld-v1
  labels:
    service.istio.io/canonical-name: helloworld
    service.istio.io/canonical-revision: v1
spec:
  replicas: 1
`
)

func fromYAML(in string) *unstructured.Unstructured {
	var un unstructured.Unstructured
	if err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(in), &un); err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

// CheckPreconditionFn returns true if precondition check failed.
type CheckPreconditionFn func(o ObjectInfo) bool

// EvalMetadataFn validates input objInfo and GetObjectInfo error and returns an updated metadata and replication decision if any
type EvalMetadataFn func(o *ObjectInfo, gerr error) (ReplicateDecision, error)

// EvalRetentionBypassFn validates input objInfo and GetObjectInfo error and returns an error if retention bypass is not allowed.

        assertViolations(result, 0, 0, 0);
    }

    @Test
    void testCiFriendlyRevision() throws Exception {
        SimpleProblemCollector result = validateRaw("raw-model/ok-ci-friendly-revision.xml");
        assertViolations(result, 0, 0, 0);
    }

    @Test
    void testCiFriendlyChangeList() throws Exception {

    feature.
*   Full new features (e.g., a new op implementing a cutting-edge algorithm)
    typically will live in
    [tensorflow/addons](https://github.com/tensorflow/addons) to get some
    airtime before a decision is made regarding whether they are to be migrated
    to the core.
*   As every PR requires several CPU/GPU hours of CI testing, we discourage
    submitting PRs to fix one typo, one warning,etc. We recommend fixing the

In the end, [after evaluation](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2123cKuYsBDpIon9FFdctWTUIMFweSjgwG7r8l3818/edit), the decision was to move forward with a Rust implementation.
This offered performance benefits that were too large to leave on the table, as well as opportunities to tune to our specific needs.

## Configuration protocol

## Changes by Kind

### API Change

 * limitations under the License.
 */

/*
 * Portions of this file are modified versions of
 * http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck/AbstractExecutorServiceTest.java?revision=1.30
 * which contained the following notice:
 *
 * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at

		})
		return
	}
	dsc, err := parseReplicateDecision(ctx, bucket, dobj.ReplicationState.ReplicateDecisionStr)
	if err != nil {
		replLogOnceIf(ctx, fmt.Errorf("unable to parse replication decision parameters for bucket: %s, err: %s, decision: %s",
			bucket, err, dobj.ReplicationState.ReplicateDecisionStr), dobj.ReplicationState.ReplicateDecisionStr)
		sendEvent(eventArgs{
			BucketName: bucket,
			Object: ObjectInfo{

Artifacts ( downloaded, failed) Artifacts size kB ( kB downloaded, kB in cache) Errors Module Revision Error Conflicts Module Selected Evicted # - by # - - # - - Dependencies Overview Details - by - - Revision: Home Page Status Publication Resolver Configurations Artifacts size kB ( kB downloaded, kB in cache) Licenses Evicted by in conflict manager Required by Organisation Name Revision In Configurations Asked Revision # - Dependencies Artifacts No artifact Name Type Ext Download Size kB org/apache/ivy/...