/**
   * Not checking the CA bit created a vulnerability in old OkHttp releases. It is exploited by
   * triggering different chains to be discovered by the TLS engine and our chain cleaner. In this
   * attack there's several different chains.
   *
   *
   * The victim's gets a non-CA certificate signed by a CA, and pins the CA root and/or
   * intermediate. This is business as usual.
   *
   * ```

      suite.addTest(
          builder
              .withFeatures(
                  CollectionSize.ZERO,
                  CollectionSize.ONE,
                  CollectionSize.SEVERAL,
                  CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES,
                  CollectionFeature.RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,
                  CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,

                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES,
                CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE,
                CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,
                CollectionSize.ONE,
                CollectionSize.SEVERAL)
            .createTestSuite());
    suite.addTestSuite(TreeMultimapNaturalTest.class);
    return suite;
  }

  protected SetMultimap<String, Integer> create() {
    return TreeMultimap.create();
  }

 * 2^32 + x}). The methods for which signedness is not an issue are in {@link Ints}, as well as
 * signed versions of methods for which signedness is an issue.
 *
 * <p>In addition, this class provides several static methods for converting an {@code int} to a
 * {@code String} and a {@code String} to an {@code int} that treat the {@code int} as an unsigned
 * number.
 *

We create an `HTTPException` that we can reuse (`raise`) later at several points.

In this exception, we include the scopes required (if any) as a string separated by spaces (using `scope_str`). We put that string containing the scopes in the `WWW-Authenticate` header (this is part of the spec).

 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code long[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

   *
   * {@snippet :
   * static final Multimap<String, Integer> STRING_TO_INTEGER_MULTIMAP =
   *     new ImmutableListMultimap.Builder<String, Integer>()
   *         .put("one", 1)
   *         .putAll("several", 1, 2, 3)
   *         .putAll("many", 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
   *         .build();
   * }
   *
   * <p>Builder instances can be reused; it is safe to call {@link #build} multiple times to build

           * modified concurrently), or it might have been only an estimate to begin with (for a
           * collection like ConcurrentHashMap, which sums up several counters that may not be in
           * sync with one another). We accommodate that by resizing as necessary.
           */
          toJoin = Arrays.copyOf(toJoin, expandedCapacity(toJoin.length, toJoin.length + 1));

      suite.addTest(
          builder
              .withFeatures(
                  CollectionSize.ZERO,
                  CollectionSize.ONE,
                  CollectionSize.SEVERAL,
                  CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES,
                  CollectionFeature.RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,
                  CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,