java.net.InetSocketAddress#<init>(java.lang.String,int)
java.net.Socket#<init>(java.lang.String,int)
java.net.Socket#<init>(java.lang.String,int,java.net.InetAddress,int)

@defaultMessage Don't bind to wildcard addresses. Be specific.
java.net.DatagramSocket#<init>()
java.net.DatagramSocket#<init>(int)
java.net.InetSocketAddress#<init>(int)
java.net.MulticastSocket#<init>()
java.net.MulticastSocket#<init>(int)
java.net.ServerSocket#<init>(int)

     */
    public static final int SMB2_SHARE_CAP_SCALEOUT = 0x20;

    /**
     * Share capability indicating cluster support.
     */
    public static final int SMB2_SHARE_CAP_CLUSTER = 0x40;

    /**
     * Share capability indicating asymmetric support.
     */
    public static final int SMB2_SHARE_CAP_ASYMMETRIC = 0x80;
    private byte shareType;
    private int shareFlags;
    private int capabilities;

        this.out = requireNonNull(out);
    }

    //
    // These are the only methods we need in our primordial logger
    //
    @Override
    public void error(String msg) {
        out.print(ERROR);
        out.println(msg);
    }

    @Override
    public void error(String msg, Throwable t) {
        error(msg);

        if (null != t) {
            t.printStackTrace(out);
        }
    }

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

      .isEqualTo(generalNameDnsName to "example.com")
    assertThat(CertificateAdapters.generalName.toDer(generalNameDnsName to "example.com"))
      .isEqualTo(bytes)
  }

  @Test fun `extension with type hint for basic constraints`() {
    val extension =
      Extension(
        BASIC_CONSTRAINTS,
        false,
        BasicConstraints(true, 4),
      )

```

і викличемо:

```Python
user_dict = user_in.model_dump()
```

тепер ми маємо `dict` з даними у змінній `user_dict` (це `dict`, а не об’єкт моделі Pydantic).

А якщо викликати:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

ми отримаємо Python `dict` з:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

pkg math/bits, func Div(uint, uint, uint) (uint, uint)
pkg math/bits, func Div32(uint32, uint32, uint32) (uint32, uint32)
pkg math/bits, func Div64(uint64, uint64, uint64) (uint64, uint64)
pkg math/bits, func Mul(uint, uint) (uint, uint)
pkg math/bits, func Mul32(uint32, uint32) (uint32, uint32)
pkg math/bits, func Mul64(uint64, uint64) (uint64, uint64)
pkg math/bits, func Sub(uint, uint, uint) (uint, uint)

	type Toy struct {
		ID        int
		Name      string
		OwnerID   int
		OwnerType string
	}
	type User struct {
		ID  int
		Cat struct {
			Name string
			Toy  Toy   `gorm:"polymorphic:Owner;"`
			Toys []Toy `gorm:"polymorphic:Owner;"`
		} `gorm:"embedded;embeddedPrefix:cat_"`
		Dog struct {
			ID     int
			Name   string
			UserID int
			Toy    Toy   `gorm:"polymorphic:Owner;"`

		expectedFailure bool
	}{
		{"", "", true},
		{"-1", "0", true},
		{"-1", "900", true},
		{"1574812326", "900", false},
		{1574812326, "900", false},
		{int64(1574812326), "900", false},
		{int(1574812326), "900", false},
		{uint(1574812326), "900", false},
		{uint64(1574812326), "900", false},
		{json.Number("1574812326"), "900", false},
		{1574812326.000, "900", false},
		{time.Duration(3) * time.Minute, "900", false},
	}

        this.changelogs = files;
    }

    @Internal
    public boolean isDryRun() {
        return dryRun;
    }

    @Option(option = "dry-run", description = "Find and print files to prune but don't actually delete them")
    public void setDryRun(boolean dryRun) {
        this.dryRun = dryRun;
    }

    @TaskAction
    public void executeTask() {
        findAndDeleteFiles(