# Seed value for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.seed=0
# Tags for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.tags=
# Fields for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.fields=
# Excluded words for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.excludes=
# Number of popular words to suggest.
suggest.popular.word.size=10
# Window size for popular word suggestion.

    }

    /**
     * Create an EditBody DTO from a CharMappingItem entity.
     *
     * @param entity source entity with mapping data
     * @param dictId identifier of the dictionary
     * @return populated EditBody for API responses
     */
    protected EditBody createEditBody(final CharMappingItem entity, final String dictId) {
        final EditBody body = new EditBody();
        body.id = entity.getId();

    protected String[] fileProtocols = StringUtil.EMPTY_STRINGS;

    /**
     * Default constructor for ProtocolHelper.
     * Initializes the helper with empty protocol arrays that will be populated during init().
     */
    public ProtocolHelper() {
        // Default constructor
    }

    /**
     * Initializes the protocol helper by loading configured protocols from FessConfig

   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is

### OAuth 1

Es gab ein OAuth 1, das sich stark von OAuth2 unterscheidet und komplexer ist, da es direkte Spezifikationen enthält, wie die Kommunikation verschlüsselt wird.

Heutzutage ist es nicht sehr populär und wird kaum verwendet.

OAuth2 spezifiziert nicht, wie die Kommunikation verschlüsselt werden soll, sondern erwartet, dass Ihre Anwendung mit HTTPS bereitgestellt wird.

/// tip | Tipp

### OAuth 1 { #oauth-1 }

There was an OAuth 1, which is very different from OAuth2, and more complex, as it included direct specifications on how to encrypt the communication.

It is not very popular or used nowadays.

OAuth2 doesn't specify how to encrypt the communication, it expects you to have your application served with HTTPS.

/// tip

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        Map<String, URLStreamHandler> handlers = (Map<String, URLStreamHandler>) handlersField.get(null);
        handlers.clear();
    }

    /**
     * Pre-populates the protocol handlers cache with mock handlers for testing.
     * This avoids the need for actual protocol handlers to be available.
     */
    private void setupMockProtocolHandlers() throws Exception {

### OAuth 1

Hubo un OAuth 1, que es muy diferente de OAuth2, y más complejo, ya que incluía especificaciones directas sobre cómo encriptar la comunicación.

No es muy popular o usado hoy en día.

OAuth2 no especifica cómo encriptar la comunicación, espera que tengas tu aplicación servida con HTTPS.

/// tip | Consejo

    stream.defaultWriteObject();
    stream.writeObject(keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl);
    Serialization.writeMap(this, stream);
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // reading field populated by writeObject
  @GwtIncompatible // java.io.ObjectInputStream
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    stream.defaultReadObject();

name: Feature Enhancement Request
description: I want to make an existing feature better
labels: ["type=enhancement"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our