// my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override
      String read(ByteSource byteSource, Charset cs) throws IOException {

        valuesBuilder.add(requireNonNull(stream.readObject()));
      }
      ImmutableSet<Object> valueSet = valuesBuilder.build();
      if (valueSet.size() != valueCount) {
        throw new InvalidObjectException("Duplicate key-value pairs exist for key " + key);
      }
      builder.put(key, valueSet);
      tmpSize += valueCount;
    }

    ImmutableMap<Object, ImmutableSet<Object>> tmpMap;
    try {

          else -> readToken()
        } ?: return // Expected a value.

      val replaced = parameters.put(peek, parameterValue)
      peek = null
      if (replaced != null) return // Unexpected duplicate parameter.
      if (!skipCommasAndWhitespace() && !exhausted()) return // Expected ',' or EOF.
    }
    result.add(Challenge(schemeName, parameters))
  }
}

/** Returns true if any commas were skipped. */

 *
 * <p>When iterating through the collections supplied by this class, the ordering of values for a
 * given key agrees with the order in which the values were added.
 *
 * <p>This multimap allows duplicate key-value pairs. After adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair, the {@code ArrayListMultimap} will contain entries for both the new
 * value and the old value.
 *

                    new ContentNotFoundException(urlQueue.getParentUrl(), url));
        }
    }

    /**
     * Stores a child URL in the crawling queue with duplicate host handling.
     * This method applies duplicate host conversion before storing the URL.
     *
     * @param childUrl the child URL to store
     * @param parentUrl the parent URL that referenced this child URL

* `frozenset`:
    * Wird in Requests und Responses wie ein `set` behandelt:
        * Bei Requests wird eine Liste gelesen, Duplikate entfernt und in ein `set` umgewandelt.
        * Bei Responses wird das `set` in eine `list`e umgewandelt.
        * Das generierte Schema zeigt an, dass die `set`-Werte eindeutig sind (unter Verwendung von JSON Schemas `uniqueItems`).

        }
        if (elements.length > 0) {
          multiset1.add(elements[0]);
        }
        if (elements.length > 1) {
          /*
           * When a test requests a multiset with duplicates, our plan of
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and an extra item 1 to B" really means
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and B," which isn't what we want.
           */

    @Override
    public void setUp() throws Exception {
        super.setUp();
        indexUpdateCallback = new FileListIndexUpdateCallbackImpl(null, null, 1);
    }

    /** Case 1: Normal merge (no duplicates) */
    public void test_mergeResponseData_noOverwrite() {
        Map<String, Object> dataMap = new HashMap<>();
        dataMap.put("a", "A0");
        Map<String, Object> responseDataMap = new HashMap<>();

    assertFalse(getMultiset().retainAll(singleton(e0())));
    expectContents(contents);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the remove tests that assume multisets support duplicates
   * so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getRemoveDuplicateInitializingMethods() {

    assertFalse(getMultiset().retainAll(singleton(e0())));
    expectContents(contents);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the remove tests that assume multisets support duplicates
   * so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getRemoveDuplicateInitializingMethods() {