/*
           * We'll accept that as sufficient "proof" that either equivalence should be able to
           * handle either reference, so it's safe to circumvent compile-time type checking.
           */
          @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
          Equivalence<Object> equivalence = (Equivalence<Object>) this.equivalence;
          return equivalence.equivalent(this.reference, that.reference);

* Don't worry too much about things like commit message styles, I will squash and merge customizing the commit manually.

* Also don't worry about style rules, there are already automatized tools checking that.

And if there's any other style or consistency need, I'll ask directly for that, or I'll add commits on top with the needed changes.

### Check the code { #check-the-code }

   *
   * - allocArrays() has been called. Callers can confirm this by checking needsAllocArrays().
   *
   * - The map has not switched to delegating to a java.util implementation to mitigate hash
   *   flooding. Callers can confirm this by null-checking delegateOrNull().
   *
   * In an ideal world, we would document why we know those things are true every time we call these

            }

            if (request != null) {
                request.setFullUNCPath(session.getTargetDomain(), session.getTargetHost(), rfullpath);
            }

            // for standalone DFS we could be checking for a referral here, too
            DfsReferralData dr = this.ctx.getDfs().resolve(this.ctx, loc.getServer(), loc.getShare(), loc.getUNCPath());
            if (dr != null) {
                if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {

     * Checks if a bucket exists in the object storage.
     * @param name the name of the bucket to check
     * @return true if the bucket exists, false otherwise
     * @throws CrawlingAccessException if an error occurs while checking bucket existence
     */
    protected boolean bucketExists(final String name) {
        try {
            final BucketExistsArgs args = BucketExistsArgs.builder().bucket(name).build();

    }

    /**
     * Test access count atomic operations
     */
    public void test_accessCountAtomicOperations() {
        // Verify atomic nature by checking return values
        assertEquals(1L, crawlerContext.incrementAndGetAccessCount());
        assertEquals(2L, crawlerContext.incrementAndGetAccessCount());
        assertEquals(3L, crawlerContext.incrementAndGetAccessCount());

            int readWrite = ACE.FILE_READ_DATA | ACE.FILE_WRITE_DATA;
            assertEquals(0x00000003, readWrite, "Combined read/write should be 0x00000003");

            // Test checking individual bits
            assertTrue((readWrite & ACE.FILE_READ_DATA) != 0, "Should contain FILE_READ_DATA bit");
            assertTrue((readWrite & ACE.FILE_WRITE_DATA) != 0, "Should contain FILE_WRITE_DATA bit");

 *   <li>Retrieving analyzer names for different fields and languages.</li>
 *   <li>Updating and deleting analyzer settings.</li>
 *   <li>Loading index settings and mappings from resources.</li>
 *   <li>Checking the availability of analyzers for supported languages.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Supported languages are defined in the SUPPORTED_LANGUAGES array.</p>
 *
 * <p>Inner class:</p>
 * <ul>

          assertThat(expected.message!!).startsWith("Certificate pinning failure!")
        }
        else -> throw expected
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Not checking the CA bit created a vulnerability in old OkHttp releases. It is exploited by
   * triggering different chains to be discovered by the TLS engine and our chain cleaner. In this
   * attack there's several different chains.
   *

                        if (file.exists()) {
                            results.add(file);
                        }
                    } catch (IOException e) {
                        log.debug("Error checking existence of: " + path, e);
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        
        return results;
    }
}
```

### 7.2 Hierarchical Cache Management
```java