<executions>
          <execution>
            <id>default-compile</id>
            <configuration>
              <compilerArgs combine.children="append" combine.self="append">
                <arg>-XDignore.symbol.file</arg>
              </compilerArgs>
            </configuration>
          </execution>
          <execution>
            <id>compile-java9</id>

func (ssekms) CreateMetadata(metadata map[string]string, keyID string, kmsKey []byte, sealedKey SealedKey, ctx kms.Context) map[string]string {
	if sealedKey.Algorithm != SealAlgorithm {
		logger.CriticalIf(context.Background(), Errorf("The seal algorithm '%s' is invalid for SSE-S3", sealedKey.Algorithm))
	}

	// There are two possibilities:
	// - We use a KMS -> There must be non-empty key ID and a KMS data key.

		ShouldPass: false,
	}, // 4
}

func TestSealUnsealKey(t *testing.T) {
	for i, test := range sealUnsealKeyTests {
		key := GenerateKey(test.SealExtKey[:], rand.Reader)
		sealedKey := key.Seal(test.SealExtKey[:], test.SealIV, test.SealDomain, test.SealBucket, test.SealObject)
		if err := key.Unseal(test.UnsealExtKey[:], sealedKey, test.UnsealDomain, test.UnsealBucket, test.UnsealObject); err == nil && !test.ShouldPass {

   *
   * <p>Note that in GWT, class names are often obfuscated.
   *
   * @param self the object to generate the string for (typically {@code this}), used only for its
   *     class name
   * @since 18.0 (since 2.0 as {@code Objects.toStringHelper()}).
   */
  public static ToStringHelper toStringHelper(Object self) {
    return new ToStringHelper(self.getClass().getSimpleName());
  }

  /**

var validSSEReplicationHeaders = map[string]string{
	"X-Minio-Internal-Server-Side-Encryption-Sealed-Key":     "X-Minio-Replication-Server-Side-Encryption-Sealed-Key",
	"X-Minio-Internal-Server-Side-Encryption-Seal-Algorithm": "X-Minio-Replication-Server-Side-Encryption-Seal-Algorithm",
	"X-Minio-Internal-Server-Side-Encryption-Iv":             "X-Minio-Replication-Server-Side-Encryption-Iv",

Especificamente, observa-se Uvicorn, Starlette e FastAPI comparados juntos (entre muitas outras ferramentas).

Quanto mais simples o problema resolvido pela ferramenta, melhor a performance que ela terá. E a maioria dos _benchmarks_ não testam as características adicionais fornecidas pela ferramenta.

A hierarquia segue assim:

* **Uvicorn**: um servidor ASGI
    * **Starlette**: (utiliza Uvicorn) um _microframework web_

Au final, peu importe le cas parmi ceux ci-dessus, **FastAPI** fonctionnera de manière asynchrone et sera extrêmement rapide.

Mais si vous suivez bien les instructions ci-dessus, alors **FastAPI** pourra effectuer quelques optimisations et ainsi améliorer les performances.

## Détails techniques

def test_pydanticv2():
    from pydantic import field_serializer

    class ModelWithDatetimeField(BaseModel):
        dt_field: datetime

        @field_serializer("dt_field")
        def serialize_datetime(self, dt_field: datetime):
            return dt_field.replace(microsecond=0, tzinfo=timezone.utc).isoformat()

    app = FastAPI()
    model = ModelWithDatetimeField(dt_field=datetime(2019, 1, 1, 8))

from fastapi import Body, FastAPI, HTTPException, Request, Response
from fastapi.exceptions import RequestValidationError
from fastapi.routing import APIRoute


class ValidationErrorLoggingRoute(APIRoute):
    def get_route_handler(self) -> Callable:
        original_route_handler = super().get_route_handler()

        async def custom_route_handler(request: Request) -> Response:
            try:
                return await original_route_handler(request)

   * @param self a collection which might contain all elements in {@code c}
   * @param c a collection whose elements might be contained by {@code self}
   */
  static boolean containsAllImpl(Collection<?> self, Collection<?> c) {
    for (Object o : c) {
      if (!self.contains(o)) {
        return false;
      }
    }
    return true;
  }

  /** An implementation of {@link Collection#toString()}. */