* Docker en Modo Swarm
* Systemd
* Supervisor
* Manejado internamente por un proveedor de nube como parte de sus servicios
* Otros...

## Replicación - Procesos y Memoria { #replication-processes-and-memory }

Con una aplicación FastAPI, usando un programa servidor como el comando `fastapi` que ejecuta Uvicorn, ejecutarlo una vez en **un proceso** puede servir a múltiples clientes concurrentemente.

       * If we make some other optimizations, this one will no longer be necessary. The optimization
       * could actually hurt in some cases, as it forces us to keep all inputs in memory until the
       * final input completes.
       */
      @RetainedLocalRef
      ImmutableCollection<? extends ListenableFuture<? extends InputT>> localFutures = futures;

        }
        return response.getStatus().getStatus();
    }

    /**
     * Calculates the memory size of a document data map.
     * This is useful for monitoring memory usage during indexing operations.
     *
     * @param dataMap the document data as a map of field names to values
     * @return the estimated memory size in bytes
     */
    public long calculateDocumentSize(final Map<String, Object> dataMap) {

* Docker Compose
* Docker в режиме Swarm (Swarm Mode)
* Systemd
* Supervisor
* Обработка внутри облачного провайдера как часть его услуг
* Прочие...

## Репликация — процессы и память { #replication-processes-and-memory }

В приложении FastAPI, используя серверную программу (например, команду `fastapi`, которая запускает Uvicorn), запуск в **одном процессе** уже позволяет обслуживать нескольких клиентов одновременно.

   * interned, and so does not prevent these instances from being garbage-collected. This most
   * likely does not perform as well as {@link #newStrongInterner}, but is the best alternative when
   * the memory usage of that implementation is unacceptable.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible("java.lang.ref.WeakReference")
  public static <E> Interner<E> newWeakInterner() {
    return newBuilder().weak().build();
  }

    - [Quality of Service for memory resources](#quality-of-service-for-memory-resources)
    - [API changes and improvements for ephemeral containers](#api-changes-and-improvements-for-ephemeral-containers)
  - [Known Issues](#known-issues)

 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashMap}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now

  public
  static HashCode hash(File file, HashFunction hashFunction) throws IOException {
    return asByteSource(file).hash(hashFunction);
  }

  /**
   * Fully maps a file read-only in to memory as per {@link
   * FileChannel#map(java.nio.channels.FileChannel.MapMode, long, long)}.
   *
   * <p>Files are mapped from offset 0 to its length.
   *
   * <p>This only works for files ≤ {@link Integer#MAX_VALUE} bytes.

					}
				} else {
					stopFn(result, nil)
				}
				ri.trackCurrentBucketObject(r.Bucket, result, success, attempts)
				globalBatchJobsMetrics.save(job.ID, ri)
				// persist in-memory state to disk after every 10secs.
				batchLogIf(ctx, ri.updateAfter(ctx, api, 10*time.Second, job))
				if success {
					break
				}
				if delay > 0 {

 * highest valued code point that requires escaping. For example a replacement map containing the
 * single character '{@code \}{@code u1000}' will require approximately 16K of memory. If you need
 * to create multiple escaper instances that have the same character replacement mapping consider
 * using {@link ArrayBasedEscaperMap}.
 *
 * @author David Beaumont
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible