}

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testAddAll_nullUnsupported()} so that tests can
   * suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-5045147">JDK-5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddAllNullUnsupportedMethod() {

        size,
        getMultiset().size());
  }

  /** Call the {@code setCount()} method under test, and check its return value. */
  abstract void setCountCheckReturnValue(E element, int count);

  /**
   * Call the {@code setCount()} method under test, but do not check its return value. Callers
   * should use this method over {@link #setCountCheckReturnValue(Object, int)} when they expect

   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),

   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),

   *       whether the author intended for the class to be a value type.
   *   <li>If a constructor or factory method takes a parameter whose type is interface, a dynamic
   *       proxy will be passed to the method. It's possible that the method body expects an
   *       instance method of the passed-in proxy to be of a certain value yet the proxy isn't aware

    private static final ImmutableMap<String, Method> typeVariableMethods;

    static {
      ImmutableMap.Builder<String, Method> builder = ImmutableMap.builder();
      for (Method method : TypeVariableImpl.class.getMethods()) {
        if (method.getDeclaringClass().equals(TypeVariableImpl.class)) {
          try {
            method.setAccessible(true);
          } catch (AccessControlException e) {

from .forward_reference_type import forwardref_method


def passthrough(f):
    @functools.wraps(f)
    def method(*args, **kwargs):
        return f(*args, **kwargs)

    return method


def test_wrapped_method_type_inference():
    """
    Regression test ensuring that when a method imported from another module
    is decorated with something that sets the __wrapped__ attribute (functools.wraps),

func RegisterCompressor(method uint16, comp Compressor) {
	if _, dup := compressors.LoadOrStore(method, comp); dup {
		panic("compressor already registered")
	}
}

func compressor(method uint16) Compressor {
	ci, ok := compressors.Load(method)
	if !ok {
		return nil
	}
	return ci.(Compressor)
}

func decompressor(method uint16) Decompressor {
	di, ok := decompressors.Load(method)
	if !ok {
		return nil
	}

   * {@link Collections#frequency} (which would presumably perform more poorly).
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> the utility method {@link Iterables#frequency} generalizes this operation; it
   * correctly delegates to this method when dealing with a multiset, but it can also accept any
   * other iterable type.
   *
   * @param element the element to count occurrences of

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image06.png">

In this case, you have:

* `ItemsService`
* `UsersService`

### Client Method Names { #client-method-names }

Right now, the generated method names like `createItemItemsPost` don't look very clean:

```TypeScript
ItemsService.createItemItemsPost({name: "Plumbus", price: 5})
```