get() = settingsRoot.id.toString().substringAfter("Gradle")

data class VersionedSettingsBranch(
    val branchName: String,
) {
    /**
     * 0~23.
     * To avoid nightly promotion jobs running at the same time,
     * we run each branch on different hours.
     * master - 0:00
     * release - 1:00
     * release6x - 2:00
     * release7x - 3:00
     * ...
     * releaseNx - (N-4):00
     */

      Android10Platform.buildIfSupported()
        ?: AndroidPlatform.buildIfSupported()
    if (androidPlatform != null) return androidPlatform

    // If the API version is 0, assume this is the Android artifact, but running on the JVM without Robolectric.
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT == 0) {
      return Jdk9Platform.buildIfSupported()
        ?: Platform()
    }

 <span style="background-color:#C4A000"><font color="#2E3436">│                                                     │</font></span>
 <span style="background-color:#C4A000"><font color="#2E3436">│  Running in development mode, for production use:   │</font></span>
 <span style="background-color:#C4A000"><font color="#2E3436">│                                                     │</font></span>

			t.Errorf("Test %d: expected: %s, got: %s", i+1, expectedStr, str)
		}
		os.Unsetenv("MARATHON_APP_LABEL_DCOS_PACKAGE_VERSION")
		os.Unsetenv(testCase.envName)
	}
}

// Tests if the environment we are running is in DCOS.
func TestIsDCOS(t *testing.T) {
	t.Setenv("MESOS_CONTAINER_NAME", "mesos-1111")
	dcos := IsDCOS()
	if !dcos {
		t.Fatalf("Expected %t, got %t", true, dcos)
	}
	os.Unsetenv("MESOS_CONTAINER_NAME")

## How to Test Your Changes to TensorFlow

You may check how your changes will affect TensorFlow by:

1. Creating a PR and observing the presubmit test results
2. Running the CI scripts locally, as explained below
3. **Google employees only**: Google employees can use an internal-only tool
called "MLCI" that makes testing more convenient: it can execute any full CI job

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

Sensitive security-related issues should be reported to [******@****.***](mailto:******@****.***).
See the [security policy](https://golang.org/security) for details.

The recommended way to file an issue is by running `go bug`.
Otherwise, when filing an issue, make sure to answer these five questions:

1. What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?
2. What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
3. What did you do?

            // https://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2013/05/explaining-the-shared-resources-plugin/
            // we only allow 1 promotion job running at the same time to avoid website xml conflicts
            feature {
                type = "JetBrains.SharedResources"
                param("locks-param", "WebsiteReleasesXml writeLock")
            }
        }
    }

In 12 drive example above, with MinIO server running in the default configuration, you can lose any of the six drives and still reconstruct the data reliably from the remaining drives.

## Why is Erasure Code useful?

      <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> tip </font></span>  Running in development mode, for production use:
             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs: