}

	if db.DefaultContextTimeout > 0 {
		if _, ok := stmt.Context.Deadline(); !ok {
			stmt.Context, _ = context.WithTimeout(stmt.Context, db.DefaultContextTimeout)
		}
	}

	// assign model values
	if stmt.Model == nil {
		stmt.Model = stmt.Dest
	} else if stmt.Dest == nil {
		stmt.Dest = stmt.Model
	}

	// parse model values
	if stmt.Model != nil {

Pero no te preocupes, puedes mostrarlo como quieras a tus usuarios finales en el frontend.

Y tus modelos de base de datos pueden usar cualquier otro nombre que desees.

Pero para la *path operation* de inicio de sesión, necesitamos usar estos nombres para ser compatibles con la especificación (y poder, por ejemplo, utilizar el sistema de documentación integrada de la API).

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>This method is suitable for the common use case of dividing work among buckets that meet the
   * following conditions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added

                (v1, v2) -> {
                  throw new IllegalArgumentException("Multiple values for key: " + v1 + ", " + v2);
                }),
        (accum, t) -> {
          /*
           * We assign these to variables before calling checkNotNull to work around a bug in our
           * nullness checker.
           */
          K key = keyFunction.apply(t);
          V newValue = valueFunction.apply(t);

- `users[].existingSecret` - secret name that contains the secretKey of user
- `users[].existingSecretKey` - data key in existingSecret secret containing the secretKey
- `users[].policy` - name of the policy to assign to user

### Create service account after install

Install the chart, specifying the service accounts you want to create after install:

```bash

- Give terminal phase correctly to all pods that will not be restarted. 

  In particular, assign Failed phase to pods which are deleted while pending. Also, assign a terminal 
  phase (Succeeded or Failed, depending on the exit statuses of the pod containers) to pods which
  are deleted while running.
  

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.