echo "error on line $1"
		for site in sitea siteb sitec sited; do
			echo "$site server logs ========="
			cat "/tmp/${site}_1.log"
			echo "==========================="
			cat "/tmp/${site}_2.log"
		done
	fi

	echo "Cleaning up instances of MinIO"
	pkill minio
	pkill -9 minio
	rm -rf /tmp/multisitea
	rm -rf /tmp/multisiteb
	rm -rf /tmp/multisitec
	rm -rf /tmp/multisited
	rm -rf /tmp/data

     *
     * @param configId the configuration ID to get excluded URLs for
     * @return a list of URLs that should be excluded from crawling, or an empty list if none
     */
    public List<String> getExcludedUrlList(final String configId) {
        final FessConfig fessConfig = ComponentUtil.getFessConfig();
        final int failureCount = fessConfig.getFailureCountThreshold();

	return errorResponseHandler
}

// If none of the http routes match respond with appropriate errors
func errorResponseHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
	if r.Method == http.MethodOptions {
		return
	}

					toSend = append(toSend, byte(i))
					toSend = append(toSend, payload...)
					select {
					case <-ctx.Done():
						return nil
					case out <- toSend:
					}
				}
				return nil
			},

			Subroute:    "some-subroute",
			OutCapacity: 1, // Only one message buffered.
			InCapacity:  0,
		}))
		errFatal(err)
	}
	const payloadSize = 512

			Type:        "sentence",
		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         target.KafkaCompressionCodec,
			Description: "specify compression_codec of the Kafka cluster",
			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "none|snappy|gzip|lz4|zstd",
		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         target.KafkaCompressionLevel,
			Description: "specify compression level of the Kafka cluster",
			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "number",
		},

service will be automatically spread across zones, enabling applications to
tolerate zone failure.
     * Simplified way to run a container on every node (DaemonSet API (Beta) in the
Extensions API group): Kubernetes can schedule a service (such as a logging
agent) that runs one, and only one, pod per node.
     * TLS and L7 support (Ingress API (Beta) in the Extensions API group): Kubernetes

This can save everyone a lot of time and frustration.

For any non-trivial change, we need to be able to answer these questions:

* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user-facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.

            resp.setHeader("Accept-Ranges", "Bytes");

            while ((n = in.read(buf)) != -1) {
                out.write(buf, 0, n);
            }
        }
        // IOException handling is done by calling code
    }

    /**
     * Compares two SMB files by name.
     * @param f1 first file to compare
     * @param f1name name of first file
     * @param f2 second file to compare

* Along with this comes the testing strategies that make this work
* The repository model where plugins can be stored and cataloged
* Bridging this into an OSGi system: if this could be done then we can basically take over p2

TODO

- dealing with processing of input and adapting GAVs before searching i.e. plugin groups in Maven and default searching

   *   <li>The visible constructor or visible static factory method with the most parameters is used
   *       to construct the sample instances. In case of tie, the candidate constructors or
   *       factories are tried one after another until one can be used to construct sample
   *       instances.
   *   <li>For the constructor or static factory method used to construct instances, it's checked