private static final String API_PATH = "/api/admin/dict/mapping";
    private static final String LIST_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "settings";
    private static final String ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "setting";
    private static final String DICT_TYPE = "mapping";

    private static final String KEY_PROPERTY = "inputs";

    @Override
    protected String getNamePrefix() {
        return NAME_PREFIX;
    }

    private static final String API_PATH = "/api/admin/dict/protwords";
    private static final String LIST_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "settings";
    private static final String ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "setting";
    private static final String DICT_TYPE = "protwords";

    private static final String KEY_PROPERTY = "input";

    @Override
    protected String getNamePrefix() {
        return NAME_PREFIX;
    }

    // then FRQ does not bother to load Finalizer.class through a separate ClassLoader. That happens
    // in our test environment, which foils the purpose of this test, so we disable the logic for
    // our test by setting a static field. We are changing the field in the parallel version of FRQ
    // and each test creates its own one of those, so there is no test interference here.
    Class<?> sepFrqSystemLoaderC =

        body.documentWordsNum = suggestHelper.getDocumentWordsNum();
        body.queryWordsNum = suggestHelper.getQueryWordsNum();
        return asJson(new ApiResult.ApiConfigResponse().setting(body).status(ApiResult.Status.OK).result());
    }

    // DELETE /api/admin/suggest/all
    @Execute
    public JsonResponse<ApiResult> delete$all() {
        if (!suggestHelper.deleteAllWords()) {

    private static final String API_PATH = "/api/admin/keymatch";
    private static final String LIST_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "settings";
    private static final String ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "setting";

    private static final String KEY_PROPERTY = "term";

    @Override
    protected String getNamePrefix() {
        return NAME_PREFIX;
    }

    @Override
    protected String getApiPath() {

			fi
		fi
	else
		echo "Bucket '$BUCKET' versioning unchanged."
	fi

	# At this point, the bucket should exist, skip checking for existence
	# Set policy on the bucket
	echo "Setting policy of bucket '$BUCKET' to '$POLICY'."
	${MC} anonymous set $POLICY myminio/$BUCKET
}

# Try connecting to MinIO instance
{{- if .Values.tls.enabled }}
scheme=https
{{- else }}
scheme=http

    protected String dictId;

    abstract protected String getDictType();

    private static final String LIST_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "settings";
    private static final String ITEM_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX = "setting";

    @Override
    protected String getListEndpointSuffix() {
        return LIST_ENDPOINT_SUFFIX + "/" + dictId;
    }

    @Override
    protected String getItemEndpointSuffix() {

to set it up refer to our [KMS Guide](https://github.com/minio/minio/blob/master/docs/kms/README.md).

Instead of configuring an external KMS you can start with a single key by
setting the env. variable `MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY`. It expects the following
format:

```sh
MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY=<key-name>:<base64-value>
```

First generate a 256 bit random key via:

```sh

But you also want it to accept new items. And when the items didn't exist before, it creates them, and returns an HTTP status code of 201 "Created".

To achieve that, import `JSONResponse`, and return your content there directly, setting the `status_code` that you want:

{* ../../docs_src/additional_status_codes/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[4,25] *}

/// warning

When you return a `Response` directly, like in the example above, it will be returned directly.

        final Map<String, Object> searchBody = new HashMap<>();
        String response = checkGetMethod(searchBody, "").asString();
        final Map<String, Object> res = JsonPath.from(response).getMap("response.setting");
        assertTrue(!res.isEmpty());
        assertEquals(new Integer(0), JsonPath.from(response).get("response.status"));
    }

    @Override
    protected void tearDown() {
        // do nothing
    }