*       tasks -- even tasks that are not themselves {@code directExecutor} tasks.
   *   <li>If many such tasks are chained together (such as with {@code
   *       future.transform(...).transform(...).transform(...)....}), they may overflow the stack.
   *       (In simple cases, callers can avoid this by registering all tasks with the same {@link
   *       MoreExecutors#newSequentialExecutor} wrapper around {@code directExecutor()}. More

    i = 1 << 30;
    assertFalse(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 1));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i));

    // 1 << 31 is negative because of overflow, 1 << 31 - 1 is positive
    // since isEvenLevel adds 1, we need to do - 2.
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel((1 << 31) - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1));

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

  }

  /** Returns a -1 if unable to parse */
  private static int tryParseDecimal(String string, int start, int end) {
    int decimal = 0;
    final int max = Integer.MAX_VALUE / 10; // for int overflow detection
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (decimal > max) {
        return -1;
      }
      decimal *= 10;
      int digit = Character.digit(string.charAt(i), 10);
      if (digit < 0) {

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

  }

  /** There's no reason for the queueSize to ever be more than maxSize + 1 */
  private static int capAtMaximumSize(int queueSize, int maximumSize) {
    return min(queueSize - 1, maximumSize) + 1; // don't overflow
  }

      setFutureSuccess.set(false);
      cancellationSuccess.set(false);
      finalResults.clear();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

  // In a previous implementation this would cause a stack overflow after ~2000 futures chained
  // together.  Now it should only be limited by available memory (and time)
  public void testSetFuture_stackOverflow() {
    SettableFuture<String> orig = SettableFuture.create();

            if ( resp.getCommand() == ServerMessageBlock.SMB_COM_READ_ANDX
                    && ( errorCode == 0 || errorCode == NtStatus.NT_STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW ) ) {
                // overflow indicator normal for pipe
                SmbComReadAndXResponse r = (SmbComReadAndXResponse) resp;
                int off = SMB1_HEADER_LENGTH;
                /* WordCount thru dataOffset always 27 */

ut-fixed")&&("undefined"!=typeof n.default.fn.overlayScrollbars?n.default(Le).overlayScrollbars({className:this._config.scrollbarTheme,sizeAutoCapable:!0,scrollbars:{autoHide:this._config.scrollbarAutoHide,clickScrolling:!0}}):n.default(Le).css("overflow-y","auto"))},t.fixLoginRegisterHeight=function(){var e=n.default("body"),t=n.default(".login-box, .register-box");if(e.hasClass("iframe-mode"))e.css("height","100%"),n.default(".wrapper").css("height","100%"),n.default("html").css("height","100%");else...

func (p *Parser) positiveAtoi(str string) int64 {
	value, err := strconv.ParseInt(str, 0, 64)
	if err != nil {
		p.errorf("%s", err)
	}
	if value < 0 {
		p.errorf("%s overflows int64", str)
	}
	return value
}

func (p *Parser) atoi(str string) uint64 {
	value, err := strconv.ParseUint(str, 0, 64)
	if err != nil {
		p.errorf("%s", err)
	}
	return value
}