/*
         * The NodeStatusResponse.readNodeNameArray method may also set this
         * information. These two places where node status data is populated should
         * be consistent. Be carefull!
         */
        this.hostName = hostName;
        this.address = address;
        this.groupName = groupName;
        this.nodeType = nodeType;
        this.isBeingDeleted = isBeingDeleted;

     * duplication of properties (multiple name/value pairs with the same name can be added).
     */
    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // create a copy to keep it consistent in case value changes
      boolean omitNullValuesSnapshot = omitNullValues;
      boolean omitEmptyValuesSnapshot = omitEmptyValues;
      String nextSeparator = "";

        // But should throw when trying to use the null path
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {
            reqWithNull.size();
        });
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should write consistent structure at different offsets")
    void testWriteBytesAtDifferentOffsets() throws Exception {
        // Test at different offsets
        int[] offsets = { 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 };

    }

    /**
     * Creates a default CIFSContext for multi-channel operations.
     * In a production implementation, this should be replaced with proper context sharing
     * from the main session to ensure consistent authentication and configuration.
     */
    private jcifs.CIFSContext createDefaultContext() throws CIFSException {
        try {
            // Use the configuration from the MultiChannelManager

   * at all are provided (an empty list), the resulting Cartesian product has one element, an empty
   * list (counter-intuitive, but mathematically consistent).
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of lists of size {@code m, n, p} is a
   * list of size {@code m x n x p}, its actual memory consumption is much smaller. When the

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L] < [1L << 63]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(long[], long[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(encKey, decKey), "Encryption and decryption keys should be different");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should produce consistent keys for same input")
    void testDeriveKeys_Consistency() {
        // Given
        int dialect = Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0311;

        // When - derive same key twice

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,

      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,