* TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users compare TypeVariables from
         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three
         * possible cases:
         *

    public void test_basicAssertion() {
        assertTrue(true);
        assertFalse(false);
        assertNotNull("test");
        assertEquals(1, 1);
    }

    // Test placeholder for future implementation
    public void test_placeholder() {
        // This test verifies the test class can be instantiated and run
        String testValue = "test";
        assertNotNull(testValue);
        assertEquals("test", testValue);

    public void test_basicAssertion() {
        assertTrue(true);
        assertFalse(false);
        assertNotNull("test");
        assertEquals(1, 1);
    }

    // Test placeholder for future implementation
    public void test_placeholder() {
        // This test verifies the test class can be instantiated and run
        String testValue = "test";
        assertNotNull(testValue);
        assertEquals("test", testValue);

    public void test_basicAssertion() {
        assertTrue(true);
        assertFalse(false);
        assertNotNull("test");
        assertEquals(1, 1);
    }

    // Test placeholder for future implementation
    public void test_placeholder() {
        // This test verifies the test class can be instantiated and run
        String testValue = "test";
        assertNotNull(testValue);
        assertEquals("test", testValue);

    public void test_basicAssertion() {
        assertTrue(true);
        assertFalse(false);
        assertNotNull("test");
        assertEquals(1, 1);
    }

    // Test placeholder for future implementation
    public void test_placeholder() {
        // This test verifies the test class can be instantiated and run
        String testValue = "test";
        assertNotNull(testValue);
        assertEquals("test", testValue);

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import java.util.List;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a
 * ConcurrentNavigableMap implementation.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class ConcurrentNavigableMapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V>
    extends NavigableMapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V> {

 *
 * <p>
 * Annotations:
 * </p>
 * <ul>
 * <li>{@link Experimental}: Indicates that this interface or its implementation
 * may still be evolving and could change in future versions.</li>
 * <li>{@link FunctionalInterface}: Denotes that this is a functional interface,
 * allowing implementations as lambda expressions or method references.</li>
 * <li>{@link Consumer}: Signifies that this type is intended to be implemented

    return new AnEnum[length];
  }

  /** Sorts the enums according to their natural ordering. */
  /*
   * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
   * Callers of TestContainerGenerator.order need to be prepared for implementations to return a new
   * collection.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")
  @Override

import java.util.EnumSet;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

import jcifs.internal.smb2.rdma.RdmaAccess;
import jcifs.internal.smb2.rdma.RdmaMemoryRegion;

/**
 * TCP memory region implementation.
 *
 * For TCP fallback, memory regions are just wrappers around
 * ByteBuffers since no real RDMA registration is needed.
 */
public class TcpMemoryRegion extends RdmaMemoryRegion {

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Implementation detail for the internal structure of {@link Range} instances. Represents a unique
 * way of "cutting" a "number line" (actually of instances of type {@code C}, not necessarily