return (logX2Floor < 2 * logFloor + 1) ? logFloor : logFloor + 1;
    }
    throw new AssertionError();
  }

  /*
   * The maximum number of bits in a square root for which we'll precompute an explicit half power
   * of two. This can be any value, but higher values incur more class load time and linearly
   * increasing memory consumption.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting static final int SQRT2_PRECOMPUTE_THRESHOLD = 256;

  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testStringConverterSerialization() {
    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(Doubles.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Double> none = Arrays.<Double>asList();
    assertThat(Doubles.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Double> one = Arrays.asList((double) 1);

  /**
   * Returns true if the given member is a method that overrides {@link Object#equals(Object)}.
   *
   * <p>The documentation for {@link Object#equals} says it should accept null, so don't require an
   * explicit {@code @NullableDecl} annotation (see <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1819">#1819</a>).
   *
   * <p>It is not necessary to consider visibility, return type, or type parameter declarations. The

I think `Union[SomeType, None]` is more explicit about what it means.

It's just about the words and names. But those words can affect how you and your teammates think about the code.

As an example, let's take this function:

					// Replace "C" with _ "unsafe", to keep program valid.
					// (Deleting import statement or clause is not safe if it is followed
					// in the source by an explicit semicolon.)
					f.Edit.Replace(f.offset(s.Path.Pos()), f.offset(s.Path.End()), `_ "unsafe"`)
				}
			}
		}
	}

	// Accumulate pointers to uses of C.x.
	if f.Ref == nil {

// converted to int they correspond to the rune size that was read.
type readOp int8

// Don't use iota for these, as the values need to correspond with the
// names and comments, which is easier to see when being explicit.
const (
	opRead      readOp = -1 // Any other read operation.
	opInvalid   readOp = 0  // Non-read operation.
	opReadRune1 readOp = 1  // Read rune of size 1.
	opReadRune2 readOp = 2  // Read rune of size 2.

    this(
        allowsNullKeys,
        allowsNullValues,
        supportsPut,
        supportsRemove,
        supportsClear,
        supportsRemove);
  }

  /** Constructor with an explicit {@code supportsIteratorRemove} parameter. */
  protected MapInterfaceTest(
      boolean allowsNullKeys,
      boolean allowsNullValues,
      boolean supportsPut,
      boolean supportsRemove,

        // whether we are working on a transitive dependency or not. This
        // allows depMgmt to always override transitive dependencies, while
        // explicit child override depMgmt (viz. depMgmt should only
        // provide defaults to children, but should override transitives).
        // We can do this by calling isChildOfRootNode on the current node.

  /**
   * Returns true if the given member is a method that overrides {@link Object#equals(Object)}.
   *
   * <p>The documentation for {@link Object#equals} says it should accept null, so don't require an
   * explicit {@code @Nullable} annotation (see <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1819">#1819</a>).
   *
   * <p>It is not necessary to consider visibility, return type, or type parameter declarations. The

   * iterable is empty.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Typical uses of the resulting iterator may produce an infinite loop. You
   * should use an explicit {@code break} or be certain that you will eventually remove all the
   * elements.
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> if the source iterable has only a single element {@code