```{ .dockerfile .annotate }
# (1)
FROM python:3.9 as requirements-stage

# (2)
WORKDIR /tmp

# (3)
RUN pip install poetry

# (4)
COPY ./pyproject.toml ./poetry.lock* /tmp/

# (5)
RUN poetry export -f requirements.txt --output requirements.txt --without-hashes

# (6)
FROM python:3.9

# (7)
WORKDIR /code

# (8)

=============

A scriptable web server for testing HTTP clients


### Motivation

This library makes it easy to test that your app Does The Right Thing when it
makes HTTP and HTTPS calls. It lets you specify which responses to return and
then verify that requests were made as expected.

Because it exercises your full HTTP stack, you can be confident that you're
testing everything. You can even copy & paste HTTP responses from your real web

            // In real implementation, this would perform RDMA read into the buffer
            // For skeleton implementation, simulate reading the requested amount
            int bytesToRead = Math.min(length, buffer.remaining());

            // Simulate RDMA read operation
            log.debug("DiSNI RDMA read request: {} bytes from remote address 0x{}", bytesToRead, Long.toHexString(remoteAddress));

            return bytesToRead;

        return indexName;
    }

    @Override
    protected LocalDateTime toLocalDateTime(final Object value) {
        if (value != null) {
            try {
                final Instant instant = Instant.from(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT.parse(value.toString()));
                return LocalDateTime.ofInstant(instant, ZoneId.systemDefault());
            } catch (final DateTimeParseException e) {

   *
   * No further calls to this listener will be made.
   */
  open fun onClosed(eventSource: EventSource) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked when an event source has been closed due to an error reading from or writing to the
   * network. Incoming events may have been lost. No further calls to this listener will be made.
   */
  open fun onFailure(
    eventSource: EventSource,
    t: Throwable?,
    response: Response?,

import kotlin.reflect.KClass
import okhttp3.internal.concurrent.TaskRunner
import okhttp3.internal.http2.Http2

object OkHttpDebugLogging {
  // Keep references to loggers to prevent their configuration from being GC'd.
  private val configuredLoggers = CopyOnWriteArraySet<Logger>()

  fun enableHttp2() = enable(Http2::class)

  fun enableTaskRunner() = enable(TaskRunner::class)

  fun logHandler() =

import okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockWebServer;

/**
 * Create UNIX domain sockets for MockWebServer and OkHttp and connect 'em together. Note that we
 * cannot do TLS over domain sockets.
 */
public class ClientAndServer {
  public void run() throws Exception {
    File socketFile = new File("/tmp/ClientAndServer.sock");
    socketFile.delete(); // Clean up from previous runs.

    MockWebServer server = new MockWebServer();

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for