// caught and forwarded to the service the task would stop executing but the service would
          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;

 * `server_max_window_bits`. This harms our ability to support these parameters:
 *
 *  * If `client_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp must close the web socket with code 1010.
 *    Otherwise it would compress values in a way that servers could not decompress.
 *  * If `server_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp will waste memory on an oversized buffer.
 *
 * See [RFC 7692, 7.1][rfc_7692] for details on negotiation process.
 *

			continue
		}
		switch header {
		case "expect":
			// Golang http server strips off 'Expect' header, if the
			// client sent this as part of signed headers we need to
			// handle otherwise we would see a signature mismatch.
			// `aws-cli` sets this as part of signed headers.
			//
			// According to
			// http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.20
			// Expect header is always of form:

     *
     * <p>Since the last element of the array is actually in the middle of the sorted structure, a
     * childless aunt node could be smaller, which would corrupt the invariant if this element
     * becomes the new parent of the aunt node. In that case, we first switch the last element with
     * its aunt node, before returning.
     */
    int swapWithConceptuallyLastElement(E actualLastElement) {

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

    private int alt;


    /**
     * This is really just for {@link jcifs.netbios.UniAddress}. It does
     * not throw an {@link java.net.UnknownHostException} because this
     * is queried frequently and exceptions would be rather costly to
     * throw on a regular basis here.
     * 
     * @param host
     * @param tc
     * @return resolved name, null if not found
     */

   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work
   *     }
   *   }
   * </pre>
   *
   * <p>...or you could respond to stop requests by implementing {@link #triggerShutdown()}, which

		if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not serialize prevResult: %v", err)
		}
		res, err := version.NewResult(conf.CNIVersion, resultBytes)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not parse prevResult: %v", err)
		}
		conf.RawPrevResult = nil
		conf.PrevResult, err = cniv1.NewResultFromResult(res)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not convert result to current version: %v", err)
		}

# Help FastAPI - Get Help

Do you like **FastAPI**?

Would you like to help FastAPI, other users, and the author?

Or would you like to get help with **FastAPI**?

There are very simple ways to help (several involve just one or two clicks).

And there are several ways to get help too.

## Subscribe to the newsletter

      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for