// Do read unlock for given LockArgs. It should return
	// * a boolean to indicate success/failure of the operation
	// * an error on failure of unlock request operation.
	// Canceling the context will abort the remote call.
	// In that case, the resource may or may not be unlocked.
	RUnlock(ctx context.Context, args LockArgs) (bool, error)

	// Do write unlock for given LockArgs. It should return

          cache-from: type=registry,ref=tensorflow/build:${{ steps.vars.outputs.REF }}-${{ matrix.python-version }}
          cache-to: type=inline
      -
        name: Image digest

However, there is also a bit of additional logic. Gateway types have extensive status reporting. Unlike Ingress, this is status reporting is done inline in the main controller, allowing status generation to be done directly in the logic processing the resources.

Additionally, Gateway involves two components writing to the cluster:

	}

	_, err = lkClient.RUnlock(context.Background(), dsync.LockArgs{})
	if err == nil {
		t.Fatal("Expected for RUnlock to fail")
	}

	_, err = lkClient.Unlock(context.Background(), dsync.LockArgs{})
	if err == nil {
		t.Fatal("Expected for Unlock to fail")
	}

		binary.LittleEndian.PutUint16(data[2:4], version)

		buf, err := ri.MarshalMsg(data)
		ri.mu.Unlock()
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
		path, err := ri.getJobReportPath()
		if err != nil {
			batchLogIf(ctx, err)
			return err
		}
		return saveConfig(ctx, api, path, buf)
	}
	ri.mu.Unlock()
	return nil
}

// Note: to be used only with batch jobs that affect multiple versions through

// in future we may allow also inline volumes in pods.
// Exactly one member can be set.
message VolumeAttachmentSource {
  // persistentVolumeName represents the name of the persistent volume to attach.
  // +optional
  optional string persistentVolumeName = 1;

  // inlineVolumeSpec contains all the information necessary to attach
  // a persistent volume defined by a pod's inline VolumeSource. This field

		}
	}
	globalProfilerMu.Unlock()

	timer := time.NewTimer(duration)
	defer timer.Stop()
	for {
		select {
		case <-ctx.Done():
			// Stop remote profiles
			go globalNotificationSys.DownloadProfilingData(GlobalContext, io.Discard)

			// Stop local
			globalProfilerMu.Lock()
			defer globalProfilerMu.Unlock()
			for k, v := range globalProfiler {
				v.Stop()

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

                packageName = annotation.getMemberValue("pn")?.stringValue ?: "",
                extraInt = annotation.getMemberValue("xi")?.intValue ?: 0
            )
        }

    private
    inline fun <reified T : Any> CtClass.ctAnnotation(): Annotation? =
        getAnnotation(T::class.java)
            ?.takeIf { Proxy.isProxyClass(it::class.java) }
            ?.let { Proxy.getInvocationHandler(it) as? AnnotationImpl }

s‘Ñ äªPartASizes‘Ñ ä¤SizeÑ ä¥MTimeÓ ¹ôc â N§MetaSys ¼x-minio-internal-inline-dataÄ true§MetaUsr‚¬content-type¸application/octet-stream¤etagÙ 9fe7a344ef4227d3e537¡vÎeçnÐÄ$•Ä sÉöQð#Ef° ÌS Û|âÓ ¹ôb Îf­Ä ñ.È´ Å Mƒ¤Type ¥V2ObjÞ ¢IDÄ sÉöQð#Ef° ÌS Û|â¤DDirÄ #" ‘³sF"¥ URÄ,C ¦EcAlgo £EcM £EcN §EcBSizeÒ §EcIndex ¦EcDist” ¨CSumAlgo ¨PartNums‘ ©PartETagsÀ©PartSizes‘Ñ äªPartASizes‘Ñ ä¤SizeÑ ä¥MTimeÓ ¹ôb Îf­§MetaSys ¼x-minio-internal-inline-dataÄ true§MetaUsr‚¬content-type¸application/octet-stream¤etagÙ 9fe7a...