private static final char GREATEST = Character.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final char[] VALUES = {LEAST, 'a', '\u00e0', '\udcaa', GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (char value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Chars.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Character.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

    // TODO(lukes): assert that the logs are full of errors
  }

  /**
   * Runs the corresponding {@link FuturesTest} test method in a new classloader that disallows
   * certain core JDK classes.
   */
  private void runTestMethod(ClassLoader classLoader) throws Exception {
    ClassLoader oldClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();

    return new SingletonImmutableSet<>(e1);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: b/315526394 - Skip the Builder entirely for the of(...) methods, since we don't need to
   * worry that we might trigger the fallback to the JDK-backed implementation? (The varargs one
   * _could_, so we could keep it as it is. Or we could convince ourselves that hash flooding is
   * unlikely in practice there, too.)
   */

  /**

    </dependency>
    <!-- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2, high priority, Java11+ -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven.resolver</groupId>
      <artifactId>maven-resolver-transport-jdk</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
      <artifactId>maven-logging</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.jline</groupId>

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

    return longBitsToDouble(significand | ONE_BITS);
  }

  static double bigToDouble(BigInteger x) {
    // This is an extremely fast implementation of BigInteger.doubleValue(). JDK patch pending.
    BigInteger absX = x.abs();
    int exponent = absX.bitLength() - 1;
    // exponent == floor(log2(abs(x)))
    if (exponent < Long.SIZE - 1) {
      return x.longValue();

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final double[] VALUES = Doubles.concat(NUMBERS, new double[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (double value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Doubles.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Double.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

    // TODO(lukes): assert that the logs are full of errors
  }

  /**
   * Runs the corresponding {@link AbstractFutureTest} test method in a new classloader that
   * disallows certain core JDK classes.
   */
  private void runTestMethod(ClassLoader classLoader) throws Exception {
    ClassLoader oldClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }