To improve this, we’re working on automation tools 🤖 to manage translations more efficiently. Once ready, documentation will be machine-translated and still reviewed by at least two native speakers ✅ before publishing. This will allow us to keep translations up-to-date while reducing the review burden on maintainers.

    /**
     * Exports all crawling information parameters to CSV format.
     * The CSV output includes: SessionId, SessionCreatedTime, Key, Value, CreatedTime.
     * Uses cursor-based selection to handle large datasets efficiently.
     *
     * @param writer the Writer to output CSV data to
     */
    public void exportCsv(final Writer writer) {
        final CsvConfig cfg = new CsvConfig(',', '"', '"');

  /**
   * Creates a new {@code ConcurrentHashMultiset} containing the specified elements, using the
   * default initial capacity, load factor, and concurrency settings.
   *
   * <p>This implementation is highly efficient when {@code elements} is itself a {@link Multiset}.
   *
   * @param elements the elements that the multiset should contain
   */
  public static <E> ConcurrentHashMultiset<E> create(Iterable<? extends E> elements) {

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

In the end, the ultimate objective is to be able to **serve your API clients** in a way that is **secure**, to **avoid disruptions**, and to use the **compute resources** (for example remote servers/virtual machines) as efficiently as possible. 🚀

   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on
   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
   * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
   *
   * <p>The returned set's {@link Object#toString} method returns a shorthand form of the set's

        }

        if (updateScope) {
            fireEvent(ResolutionListener.UPDATE_SCOPE, listeners, nearest, farthestArtifact);

            // previously we cloned the artifact, but it is more efficient to just update the artifactScope
            // if problems are later discovered that the original object needs its original artifactScope value,
            // cloning may
            // again be appropriate