from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI

from .dependencies import get_query_token, get_token_header
from .internal import admin
from .routers import items, users

app = FastAPI(dependencies=[Depends(get_query_token)])


app.include_router(users.router)
app.include_router(items.router)
app.include_router(
    admin.router,
    prefix="/admin",
    tags=["admin"],
    dependencies=[Depends(get_token_header)],

app = FastAPI()

router = APIRouter()


@router.get("/users/{id}")
def read_user(segment: str, id: str):
    return {"segment": segment, "id": id}


app.include_router(router, prefix="/{segment}")


client = TestClient(app)


def test_get():
    response = client.get("/seg/users/foo")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text

    [
        ("me", {"user_id": "the current user"}),
        ("alice", {"user_id": "alice"}),
    ],
)
def test_get_users(user_id: str, expected_response: dict):
    response = client.get(f"/users/{user_id}")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == expected_response


def test_openapi_schema():
    response = client.get("/openapi.json")

		Result  string
		Vars    []interface{}
	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Delete{}, clause.From{}},
			"DELETE FROM `users`", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Delete{Modifier: "LOW_PRIORITY"}, clause.From{}},
			"DELETE LOW_PRIORITY FROM `users`", nil,
		},
	}

	for idx, result := range results {
		t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("case #%v", idx), func(t *testing.T) {

### Tenant isolation

Since any tenants or users providing models, graphs or checkpoints can execute
code in context of the TensorFlow service, it is important to design isolation
mechanisms that prevent unwanted access to the data from other tenants.

Network isolation between different models is also important not only to prevent
unauthorized access to data or models, but also to prevent malicious users or

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

                                }
                            },
                        },
                    },
                },
            },
            "/users/": {
                "post": {
                    "tags": ["users"],
                    "summary": "Create User",
                    "operationId": "create_user_users__post",
                    "requestBody": {
                        "content": {

    skip_users: Container[str],
    min_count: int = 2,
) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
    users: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
    for commenter, count in counter.most_common(50):
        if commenter in skip_users:
            continue
        if count >= min_count:
            author = authors[commenter]
            users.append(
                {
                    "login": commenter,
                    "count": count,

        /**
         * Maven user properties. These are properties that users configure through various means such as
         * maven-user.properties files, maven.config files, command line parameters (-D flags), settings.xml,
         * or environment variables. They are evaluated during the build process and represent the primary
         * way for users to customize Maven's behavior at runtime.
         */
        USER_PROPERTIES,

from fastapi import FastAPI

app = FastAPI()


@app.get("/items/", tags=["items"])
async def read_items():
    return [{"name": "Foo", "price": 42}]


@app.get("/users/", tags=["users"])
async def read_users():
    return [{"username": "johndoe"}]


@app.get("/elements/", tags=["items"], deprecated=True)
async def read_elements():