// This file is part of MinIO Object Storage stack
//
// This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

<a href="#Types">underlying type</a> and operations as the given type,
and binds an identifier to it.
</p>

<pre class="ebnf">
TypeDef = identifier Type .
</pre>

<p>
The new type is called a <i>defined type</i>.
It is <a href="#Type_identity">different</a> from any other type,
including the type it is created from.
</p>

<pre>
type (

    client.newCall(Request(url = server.url("/"))).execute().use {
      assertThat(it.body.string()).isEqualTo("abc")
    }
  }

  @Test
  fun testExternalSite() {
    val client = clientRule.newClient()

    client.newCall(Request(url = "https://google.com/robots.txt".toHttpUrl())).execute().use {
      assertThat(it.code).isEqualTo(200)
    }
  }

  @ParameterizedTest

 *
 * @author Bob Lee
 * @since 2.0
 * @deprecated This exception is no longer thrown by {@code com.google.common}. Previously, it was
 *     thrown by {@link MapMaker} computing maps. When support for computing maps was removed from
 *     {@code MapMaker}, it was added to {@code CacheBuilder}, which throws {@code
 *     ExecutionException}, {@code UncheckedExecutionException}, and {@code ExecutionError}. Any

## Scope

The vulnerability management policy described in this document covers the
process of investigating, assessing and resolving a vulnerability report
opened by a MinIO employee or an external third party.

Therefore, it lists pre-conditions and actions that should be performed to
resolve and fix a reported vulnerability.

## Vulnerability Management Process

The vulnerability management process requires that the vulnerability report

        MavenProject project = new MavenProject( new Model() );

        Set<Artifact> result = project.createArtifacts( dependencyFilter );

        for (Iterator<Artifact> it = result.iterator(); it.hasNext(); )
        {
            Artifact artifact = it.next();

            if ( "test-artifact2".equals( artifact.getArtifactId() ) )
            {
                ArtifactFilter filter = artifact.getDependencyFilter();

private
fun hasFunctionAttribute(functionsSupplier: Supplier<MutableList<KmFunction>>, jvmSignature: String, predicate: AttributePredicate) =
    functionsSupplier.get().firstOrNull {
        jvmSignature == it.signature?.toString()
    }?.let { predicate.match(it) } ?: false


private

      check(retry == null)
      return FakePlan(nextPlanId++)
        .also {
          retry = it
        }
    }

    fun createConnectTcpNextPlan(): FakePlan {
      check(connectTcpNextPlan == null)
      return FakePlan(nextPlanId++)
        .also {
          connectTcpNextPlan = it
        }
    }

    fun createConnectTlsNextPlan(): FakePlan {
      check(connectTlsNextPlan == null)

      assertThat(it.protocol).isEqualTo(Protocol.HTTP_2)
      assertThat(it.handshake!!.tlsVersion).isEqualTo(TlsVersion.TLS_1_3)
    }

    client.connectionPool.evictAll()
    assertEquals(0, client.connectionPool.connectionCount())

    client.newCall(request).execute().use {
      assertThat(it.protocol).isEqualTo(Protocol.HTTP_2)
      assertThat(it.handshake!!.tlsVersion).isEqualTo(TlsVersion.TLS_1_3)

       actually changes the test classpath itself. This means that it
       can"t benefit from incremental build acceleration, because on every
       execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare
       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on